Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: switch to nixpkgs #1126

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

rgrinberg
Copy link
Member

Use nixpkgs instead of opam-nix by default.

It's far faster and does everything we need.

Signed-off-by: Rudi Grinberg me@rgrinberg.com

@rgrinberg
Copy link
Member Author

@3Rafal you might have to adjust your workflow a little.

@rgrinberg rgrinberg force-pushed the ps/rr/refactor__switch_to_nixpkgs branch from bd80633 to 33498c6 Compare June 8, 2023 16:19
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 8, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3821

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 17.36%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3819: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 4073
Relevant Lines: 23462

💛 - Coveralls

Use nixpkgs instead of opam-nix by default.

It's far faster and does everything we need.

Signed-off-by: Rudi Grinberg <me@rgrinberg.com>

<!-- ps-id: d2e443b7-3973-4cdb-a678-6a5eafbc9f39 -->
@rgrinberg rgrinberg force-pushed the ps/rr/refactor__switch_to_nixpkgs branch from 33498c6 to 3a0c39f Compare June 9, 2023 15:04
@rgrinberg rgrinberg merged commit cba0b2d into master Jun 9, 2023
12 of 13 checks passed
@rgrinberg rgrinberg deleted the ps/rr/refactor__switch_to_nixpkgs branch June 9, 2023 15:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants