New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Py 1.0 #11446
Add Py 1.0 #11446
Conversation
✅ All lint checks passed 1dfda4e
✅ Installability check (8323 → 8324)
|
It looks like |
I think it's more general, plenty of packages are failing in that way. This looks fine |
packages/py/py.1.0/opam
Outdated
"ctypes" {>= "0.13.0"} | ||
"ctypes-foreign" {>= "0.4.0"} | ||
] | ||
depopts: [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can remove this line, it's necessary only if you have depopts (same for the tags
)
I can see on the repository that you have tests but you don't have a |
Okay, @mseri - I have made your suggested changes. Please let me know if there is anything else I should address before it's ready to merge. Thanks. |
Thanks! The tests now are failing. I think it's due to the missing python devel libraries. You should be able to fix it in most cases adding specific
|
@mseri, Thanks! I have updated the depexts, but it seems to be failing on CentOS now as well. |
Mmh, it’s a bit trickier than that. The error now says
And from python’s documentation looks like this symbol has been introduced in python 3.5 |
Hmm, yeah I saw that. I don't think I want to support Python 3.4 right now. Thanks for your help. |
@zshipko It's ok to only support Python 3.5. It may be better to leave out the depext for OS distributions which don't provide a recent enough Python version and include a note stating that Python 3.5 or later is required. |
@hcarty, Great! I've documented the requirement in the descr file. Is that sufficient? |
You could add some extra messages for users (see https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/blob/master/packages/lwt/lwt.3.2.1/opam and https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/blob/master/packages/mysql/mysql.1.2.2/opam for examples). I think this is ok to merge as-is or with the extra messages. What is your preference @zshipko? |
@hcarty I just added a message to the opam file. |
Thanks! I think it’s fine to merge now. I’ll leave it open for comments a bit more and merge in the afternoon |
@mseri Sounds good! |
Agreed that this looks good. Thank you for your patience @zshipko! |
Thanks for the patience. Feel free to announce this release on https://discuss.ocaml.org, we have an |
No description provided.