Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Usage of quick_digest to track installed files doesn't work on Docker #3997

Open
kit-ty-kate opened this issue Sep 27, 2019 · 9 comments
Open

Comments

@kit-ty-kate
Copy link
Member

Currently Docker doesn't store the nanosecond part of mtime of files in-between commands (see moby/moby#40004). However opam does use and store the nanosecond part and thinks the file changed and thus doesn't remove the files when instructed to.

Example (taken from the docker issue above):

docker build --no-cache .                                                                                                                                                                                                        [4.07.1]
Sending build context to Docker daemon  2.048kB
Step 1/4 : FROM ocaml/opam2
 ---> 2dae3f7f8c97
Step 2/4 : RUN touch test.ml
 ---> Running in e454ba2f273e
Removing intermediate container e454ba2f273e
 ---> 252832be85a4
Step 3/4 : RUN opam exec -- ocamlopt test.ml && stat test.cmx
 ---> Running in aa36444a3335
  File: test.cmx
  Size: 167       	Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   regular file
Device: 3eh/62d	Inode: 26825932    Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: ( 1000/    opam)   Gid: ( 1000/    opam)
Access: 2019-09-27 21:56:21.377654651 +0100
Modify: 2019-09-27 21:56:21.373654605 +0100
Change: 2019-09-27 21:56:21.373654605 +0100
 Birth: -
Removing intermediate container aa36444a3335
 ---> fec7beec4029
Step 4/4 : RUN stat test.cmx
 ---> Running in 9921d4dc9239
  File: test.cmx
  Size: 167       	Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   regular file
Device: 3eh/62d	Inode: 26826002    Links: 1
Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--)  Uid: ( 1000/    opam)   Gid: ( 1000/    opam)
Access: 2019-09-27 21:56:21.000000000 +0100
Modify: 2019-09-27 21:56:21.000000000 +0100
Change: 2019-09-27 21:56:21.789659327 +0100
 Birth: -
Removing intermediate container 9921d4dc9239
 ---> 02d86804a92a
Successfully built 02d86804a92a

This has caused problem to the CI several times (e.g. ocaml/opam-repository#14938 (comment), ocaml/opam-repository#14685 (comment), …)

@kit-ty-kate kit-ty-kate changed the title quick_digest to track installed files doesn't work on Docker Usage of quick_digest to track installed files doesn't work on Docker Sep 27, 2019
kit-ty-kate added a commit to kit-ty-kate/opam-ci-scripts that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2019
@AltGr
Copy link
Member

AltGr commented Oct 1, 2019

Have you tried setting OPAMPRECISETRACKING=1 ? It should switch to using checksums instead ; these were only disabled by default for speed reasons.

@AltGr
Copy link
Member

AltGr commented Oct 1, 2019

Big thumbs up for digging up this issue too 👍

kit-ty-kate added a commit to kit-ty-kate/opam-ci-scripts that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2019
@kit-ty-kate
Copy link
Member Author

Have you tried setting OPAMPRECISETRACKING=1 ? It should switch to using checksums instead ; these were only disabled by default for speed reasons.

It does work! Thank you! This issue is now mitigated in the opam-repository CI. It might be worth adding it by default to the docker images as well. What do you think @avsm?

@kit-ty-kate
Copy link
Member Author

cc @talex5 as well for the ocurrent images

@ejgallego
Copy link

cc @erikmd is this relevant to Coq's images? See also coq-community/bignums#36

@kit-ty-kate
Copy link
Member Author

@ejgallego I believe it is

@cfcs
Copy link

cfcs commented Mar 8, 2020

Isn't this technically speaking a bug in Docker?

@RalfJung
Copy link

RalfJung commented Mar 8, 2020

From what I gather the issue is that nanoseconds in timestamps are not preserved, and opam doesn't like that?

It's not just Docker, we had issues on CI for more than a year until we realized that the CI cache likely does not preserve nanoseconds and hence we had to set OPAMPRECISETRACKING and re-generate all caches.

One thing that would help is for opam to detect that the timestamp is almost right, and say as much in the error/warning that it shows, and tell users about the env var as a possible fix.

erikmd added a commit to coq-community/docker-base that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2020
@dra27 dra27 added this to To do in Opam 2.2.0 via automation Jul 19, 2021
@dra27
Copy link
Member

dra27 commented Jul 19, 2021

Possible scheme for this discussed last Friday which @AltGr might get to for 2.2.0 (:wink:):

  • Always compute checksums on installation of files, so have the .changes file always include a checksum and a timestamp
  • On scanning, use the timestamp first (unless OPAMPRECISETRACKING=true, obviously). If the timestamp differs, then use the checksum. If the checksum is correct, update the timestamp.
  • For docker containers, it might be worth adding a subcommand or option to opam clean or opam config which force rescans all .changes files. This would allow a Dockerfile to do RUN opam config check-changes (or something) as a separate step from RUN opam install 300-packages. Another option for Docker might be to have a configuration option in .opam/config which explicit disables comparison of nanoseconds.

@dra27 dra27 moved this from To do to Bump to 2.3? in Opam 2.2.0 Jan 13, 2022
@dra27 dra27 removed this from Bump to 2.3? in Opam 2.2.0 May 17, 2022
@dra27 dra27 added this to To do in Opam 2.3 via automation May 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Opam 2.3
  
To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants