Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recommendation on updating the add-in #173

Closed
vtiti opened this issue Dec 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Recommendation on updating the add-in #173

vtiti opened this issue Dec 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@vtiti
Copy link

vtiti commented Dec 6, 2018

Hi. T

his page describes how to update my submission to the AppSource.
It would be nice if there were some words, how should I handle the submission if I want to update my add-in.

Here is an example scenario:
We submitted an add-in successfully. Then we implement something cool, but it needs to change something in the manifest. When we submit the new manifest it contains the url to the add-in code. So it is necessary to update the addin code before the submission, which means the live audience got the new add-in before the approval.
What is the good/recommended way to upgrade the add-in?

Another thing not clean for me:
The submission form has a version field, which gets the value from the manifest. If we updating the add-in we may change the version which may be shown in the add-in UI. We may update something small, maybe something big.
What is the recommended process to update the version in the manifest?

Thanks.


Document Details

Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

@Lauragra
Copy link
Collaborator

Lauragra commented Dec 6, 2018

Thanks for reaching out. @PhilSmail , can you take a look please?

@PhilSmail
Copy link
Collaborator

Apologies. Just seeing this now
RE the upgrade the typical way developers deal with this is versioning the URL in the manifest. If you're old version is http://mysite/v1.0 and your new one is http://mysite/v2.0 then your v2.0 URL can provide the new experience before it goes public

Re version numbers. That's an interesting question but it's ultiamtely up to you. The versioning follows the format A.B.C.D
A for big changes, B for medium changes, C for bug fixes etc. D isn't normally used

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants