Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rocky's idea, tweak TrappedRook together with King psqt. #2447

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

xoto10
Copy link
Contributor

@xoto10 xoto10 commented Dec 9, 2019

Small tweak to increase the TrappedRook penalty. Nice idea Rocky!

STC :
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) [-1.50,4.50]
Total: 36977 W: 8212 L: 7993 D: 20772
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5dee1c1e3cff9a249bb9e46d

LTC :
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) [0.00,3.50]
Total: 36395 W: 6070 L: 5795 D: 24530
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5dee90153cff9a249bb9e479

Bench 5176990

@Rocky640
Copy link

Rocky640 commented Dec 9, 2019

For the record, the idea was to run an experimental tuning with disabled castling in the hope to get more hits on the TrappedRook and the king in the c1- f1-f2-c2 area
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5dec57be51219d7befdc76e1

A first interpretation of that tuning was green STC (0, 4)
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ded04bc51219d7befdc773a
and yellow LTC (0, 4)
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ded1e7a51219d7befdc7760

Thank you @xoto for trying this. Indeed, because the tuned Kc2 and Kf2 values were quite different , it was a good idea to try something more neutral.

@snicolet snicolet closed this in 3ef0c3c Dec 10, 2019
@snicolet
Copy link
Member

Merged via 3ef0c3c, congrats! :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants