Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove attacked pawns from storm evaluation #2698

Closed

Conversation

MJZ1977
Copy link
Contributor

@MJZ1977 MJZ1977 commented May 24, 2020

Remove attacked pawns from storm evaluation and make penalty dependent to the rank for blocked pawns.

STC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 54456 W: 11009 L: 10737 D: 32710
Ptnml(0-2): 929, 6326, 12523, 6444, 1006
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ec962e4404591b2793008a5

LTC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 62448 W: 9018 L: 8664 D: 44766
Ptnml(0-2): 462, 5928, 18121, 6220, 493
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ec976a8a586eee45aa2ab40

Non regression STC with "noob_3moves.epd" opening book
LLR: 3.81 (-2.94,2.94) {-1.50,0.50}
Total: 91896 W: 17770 L: 17653 D: 56473
Ptnml(0-2): 1598, 10782, 21124, 10793, 1651
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ec9b83ea586eee45aa2ab96

Bench 4488597

Bench 4488597
MJZ1977 referenced this pull request in MJZ1977/Stockfish May 24, 2020
@anshulongithub
Copy link

Test for non regression after rebase with normal opening book for this PR is running here under:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ec9b83ea586eee45aa2ab96

@d3vv
Copy link

d3vv commented May 24, 2020

non-regression passed at STC..

@vondele
Copy link
Member

vondele commented May 24, 2020

I guess it might make sense to see what the result of this test:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5eca32afa586eee45aa2abc3
is

@xoto10
Copy link
Contributor

xoto10 commented May 25, 2020

My test had a long run but ended up finishing only just yellow:

LLR: -2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 186784 W: 37575 L: 37500 D: 111709
Ptnml(0-2): 3388, 21802, 42859, 22033, 3310 

I suggest we merge this more flexible BlockedStorm (yay!) and then people can have a go at improving it further :)

@vondele vondele closed this in 7f2c8a2 May 25, 2020
@vondele
Copy link
Member

vondele commented May 25, 2020

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants