Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Give bonus for bishops that are alligned with enemy kingring. #2708

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

locutus2
Copy link
Member

Inspired from Vizvezdenec succesful patch "Give bonus for rooks that are alligned with enemy kingring" I reused this idea for bishops.
But here we only consider attacks that are not blocked by any pawn. Also we have a 50% higher bonus than for the rooks.

STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 68960 W: 13495 L: 13202 D: 42263
Ptnml(0-2): 1213, 8018, 15802, 8157, 1290
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ed27495042fa6d77c3553aa

LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 54560 W: 7105 L: 6780 D: 40675
Ptnml(0-2): 379, 4986, 16254, 5253, 408
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ed30375596e6dc1e1f97425

Bench: 4431918

Inspired from Vizvezdenec succesful patch "Give bonus for rooks that are alligned with enemy kingring" I reused this idea for bishops.
But here we only consider attacks that are not blocked by any pawn. Also we have a 50% higher bonus than for the rooks.

STC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.50,1.50}
Total: 68960 W: 13495 L: 13202 D: 42263
Ptnml(0-2): 1213, 8018, 15802, 8157, 1290
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ed27495042fa6d77c3553aa

LTC:
LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 54560 W: 7105 L: 6780 D: 40675
Ptnml(0-2): 379, 4986, 16254, 5253, 408
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ed30375596e6dc1e1f97425

Bench: 4431918
@vondele vondele closed this in d1ec10c Jun 1, 2020
@vondele
Copy link
Member

vondele commented Jun 1, 2020

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants