Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tuned values for search constants/ #2735

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

xoto10
Copy link
Contributor

@xoto10 xoto10 commented Jun 13, 2020

Tuned search constants after many search patches since the last successful tune.

1st LTC @ 60+0.6 th 1 :
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 57656 W: 7369 L: 7036 D: 43251
Ptnml(0-2): 393, 5214, 17336, 5437, 448
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee1e074f29b40b0fc95af19

SMP LTC @ 20+0.2 th 8 :
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 83576 W: 9731 L: 9341 D: 64504
Ptnml(0-2): 464, 7062, 26369, 7406, 487
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee35a21f29b40b0fc95b008

The changes were rebased on top of a successful patch by Viz (see #2734) and 2 different ways of doing this were tested. The successful test modified the constants in the patch by Viz in a similar manner to the tuning run:

LTC (rebased) @ 60+0.6 th 1 :
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 193384 W: 24241 L: 23521 D: 145622
Ptnml(0-2): 1309, 17497, 58472, 17993, 1421
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee43319ca6c451633a995f9

Further work: the recent patch to quantize eval #2733 affects search quite a bit, so doing another tune in, say, 3 months time might be a good idea.

Bench 4246971

xoto10 referenced this pull request in xoto10/stockfish-xoto10 Jun 13, 2020
@Vizvezdenec
Copy link
Contributor

The best thing there is imho the change in probcut.
I've tried this flat change previously and it almost passed LTC.

@xoto10
Copy link
Contributor Author

xoto10 commented Jun 13, 2020

Note that submission deadline for TCEC SuperFinal is now 12:00 UTC on Thursday, so there is less urgency to finalise a superfinal version asap.
I could even run another tune on top of the quantize patch as that must affect search quite a bit.

@snicolet snicolet closed this in 42b7dbc Jun 13, 2020
@snicolet
Copy link
Member

Merged via 42b7dbc, congrats!

@anshulongithub
Copy link

@xoto10 there is core surge on fishtest right now, you cud actually run another tun on top of the quantize patch now!!! i'd say go for it!

mstembera pushed a commit to mstembera/Stockfish that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2020
Tuned search constants after many search patches since the last
successful tune.

1st LTC @ 60+0.6 th 1 :
LLR: 2.97 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 57656 W: 7369 L: 7036 D: 43251
Ptnml(0-2): 393, 5214, 17336, 5437, 448
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee1e074f29b40b0fc95af19

SMP LTC @ 20+0.2 th 8 :
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 83576 W: 9731 L: 9341 D: 64504
Ptnml(0-2): 464, 7062, 26369, 7406, 487
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee35a21f29b40b0fc95b008

The changes were rebased on top of a successful patch by Viz (see official-stockfish#2734)
and two different ways of doing this were tested. The successful test
modified the constants in the patch by Viz in a similar manner to the
tuning run:

LTC (rebased) @ 60+0.6 th 1 :
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.75}
Total: 193384 W: 24241 L: 23521 D: 145622
Ptnml(0-2): 1309, 17497, 58472, 17993, 1421
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5ee43319ca6c451633a995f9

Further work: the recent patch to quantize eval official-stockfish#2733 affects search quit
quite a bit, so doing another tune in, say, three months time might be a
good idea.

closes official-stockfish#2735

Bench 4246971
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants