Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do we need person level exposures? #10

Open
rtmill opened this issue Mar 26, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Do we need person level exposures? #10

rtmill opened this issue Mar 26, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
archive This issue is related to an older version of the project
Projects
OHDSI GIS version 1.0

Comments

@rtmill
Copy link
Collaborator

rtmill commented Mar 26, 2019

Larger topic.

In order to integrate with the other tools, do we need to persist patient-level records or can we keep them at their native state (i.e. location and area). I believe, with adjustments to the WebAPI and ATLAS, we can do cohort discovery without persisting the person level data. What about the prediction packages?
@rtmill rtmill added this to To do in OHDSI GIS version 1.0 via automation Mar 26, 2019
@kzollove kzollove added the archive This issue is related to an older version of the project label Sep 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
archive This issue is related to an older version of the project
Projects
No open projects
OHDSI GIS version 1.0
  
To do
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rtmill @kzollove