Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 3, 2022. It is now read-only.

Update eslint-plugin-promise to the latest version 馃殌 #140

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Aug 17, 2018

Version 4.0.0 of eslint-plugin-promise was just published.

Dependency eslint-plugin-promise
Current Version 3.8.0
Type devDependency

The version 4.0.0 is not covered by your current version range.

If you don鈥檛 accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.

It might be worth looking into these changes and trying to get this project onto the latest version of eslint-plugin-promise.

If you have a solid test suite and good coverage, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes directly by merging the proposed change into your project. If the build fails or you don鈥檛 have such unconditional trust in your tests, this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Commits

The new version differs by 12 commits.

  • 764f004 4.0.0
  • ff1635d chore: support ESLint v5 (#144)
  • 9ac5b6f revert: update test dependencies
  • 1e15366 chore(package): update to prettier@1.14
  • bcb6808 chore(package): update test dependencies
  • 81015c3 ci(travis): install and use npm v6
  • 24c4bd7 docs(param-names): clarify that param-names includes ordering (#143)
  • 15f0649 feat(fixer): add fixer to no-new-statics rule (#133)
  • 56434a6 chore(package): update ESLint plugins (#141)
  • 47d5c55 docs(param-names): fix incorrect description location (#137)
  • 54f1958 chore(package): update to prettier@1.13.0 (#135)
  • 586d9eb chore: simplify linter configuration (#134)

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don鈥檛 help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 馃尨

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 17, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #140 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #140   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    99.1%   99.1%           
======================================
  Files          21      21           
  Lines         561     561           
  Branches       75      75           
======================================
  Hits          556     556           
  Misses          5       5

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
螖 = absolute <relative> (impact), 酶 = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a8d0e0b...ea3f293. Read the comment docs.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Sep 7, 2018

Version 4.0.1 just got published.

Update to this version instead 馃殌

Commits

The new version differs by 3 commits.

  • 61a373c 4.0.1
  • 1b01507 docs(changelog): prepare for v4.0.1
  • af28d6f fix(param-names): remove fixer (#146)

See the full diff

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2019
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Apr 1, 2019

Update to this version instead 馃殌

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2019
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Apr 1, 2019

Update to this version instead 馃殌

Commits

The new version differs by 2 commits.

See the full diff

greenkeeper bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2019
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jun 25, 2019

Update to this version instead 馃殌

Commits

The new version differs by 6 commits.

  • 5b935bd 4.2.1
  • 9017a70 4.2.1
  • 254c0fd 4.2.0
  • 3f2c61d Merge pull request #136 from ota-meshi/fix/no-return-wrap
  • 57267ca Add testcase
  • d8b9206 Fixed that no-return-wrap does not work if type is not "ExpressionStatement".

See the full diff

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants