Add dnn parameter in config file #64
Conversation
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
2 similar comments
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
ok to test |
| @@ -68,6 +69,7 @@ configuration: | |||
| opc: "981d464c7c52eb6e5036234984ad0bcf" | |||
| key: "5122250214c33e723a5dd523fc145fc0" | |||
| sequenceNumber: "16f3b3f70fc2" | |||
| dnn: "internet" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we make it list ? just a thought. We would be supporting multiple PDU sessions at some point in time. or should we keep it simple for now ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we keep it simple now? We need to map dnnList with SliceSupportList for multiple PDU sessions for each UE.
I will try to create PR for that later. If it is okay then I have also addressed it for S-Nssai in latest commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, please make a note that dnn and snssai is not list when it is added in PduSessionEstablishmentRequest.
- Multiple
PduSessionEstablishmentRequestneed to be triggered based on this list (i.e it is to be handled beforefunc HandlePduSessEstRequestEvent).
OR - We may need to address it before with optional IE
RequestedNssai(which is not supported currently in gnbsim) in either first (initailUEMessage) or second (security mode complete) registration request message. And then based onRequestedNssaiby UE andAllowedNssai/ConfiguredNssaiby CN, we need to trigger multiplePduSessionEstablishmentRequest
|
Do you want to update NAS module tag in the gnbsim ? I just created tag for gas module v1.1.3 with PTI fix. |
Signed-off-by: kharade <rohan.kharade@openairinterface.org>
Addressed in latest commit |
Signed-off-by: kharade <rohan.kharade@openairinterface.org>
| @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ configuration: | |||
| taiSliceSupportList: | |||
| - sst: 1 # Slice/Service Type (uinteger, range: 0~255) | |||
| sd: 010203 # Slice Differentiator (3 bytes hex string, range: 000000~FFFFFF) | |||
| - sst: 1 | |||
| sd: 000001 | |||
| - sst: 2 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What happens if there is no sd ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is not encoded in the NGSetupRequest message by Gnbsim.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you please point me to code where its skipped ? Approving code, assuming we will not be dealing with situation immediately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optional field Sd encoding at NGAP
Hence it is decoded at AMF like this
NGSetupRequestIEs ::= {
id: 102
criticality: 0 (reject)
value: SupportedTAList ::= {
SupportedTAItem ::= {
tAC: 00 A0 00
broadcastPLMNList: BroadcastPLMNList ::= {
BroadcastPLMNItem ::= {
pLMNIdentity: 02 F8 59
tAISliceSupportList: SliceSupportList ::= {
SliceSupportItem ::= {
s-NSSAI: S-NSSAI ::= {
sST: 01
sD: 01 02 03
}
}
SliceSupportItem ::= {
s-NSSAI: S-NSSAI ::= {
sST: 01
sD: 00 00 01
}
}
SliceSupportItem ::= {
s-NSSAI: S-NSSAI ::= {
sST: 02
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
No description provided.