New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FPBug fix based on Lanchon and zeitferne's work. #3
Open
ratcashdev
wants to merge
14
commits into
omnirom:android-4.4
Choose a base branch
from
ratcashdev:android-4.4
base: android-4.4
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fix a hole in the VFP thread migration. Lets define two threads. Thread 1, we'll call 'interesting_thread' which is a thread which is running on CPU0, using VFP (so vfp_current_hw_state[0] = &interesting_thread->vfpstate) and gets migrated off to CPU1, where it continues execution of VFP instructions. Thread 2, we'll call 'new_cpu0_thread' which is the thread which takes over on CPU0. This has also been using VFP, and last used VFP on CPU0, but doesn't use it again. The following code will be executed twice: cpu = thread->cpu; /* * On SMP, if VFP is enabled, save the old state in * case the thread migrates to a different CPU. The * restoring is done lazily. */ if ((fpexc & FPEXC_EN) && vfp_current_hw_state[cpu]) { vfp_save_state(vfp_current_hw_state[cpu], fpexc); vfp_current_hw_state[cpu]->hard.cpu = cpu; } /* * Thread migration, just force the reloading of the * state on the new CPU in case the VFP registers * contain stale data. */ if (thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu != cpu) vfp_current_hw_state[cpu] = NULL; The first execution will be on CPU0 to switch away from 'interesting_thread'. interesting_thread->cpu will be 0. So, vfp_current_hw_state[0] points at interesting_thread->vfpstate. The hardware state will be saved, along with the CPU number (0) that it was executing on. 'thread' will be 'new_cpu0_thread' with new_cpu0_thread->cpu = 0. Also, because it was executing on CPU0, new_cpu0_thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu = 0, and so the thread migration check is not triggered. This means that vfp_current_hw_state[0] remains pointing at interesting_thread. The second execution will be on CPU1 to switch _to_ 'interesting_thread'. So, 'thread' will be 'interesting_thread' and interesting_thread->cpu now will be 1. The previous thread executing on CPU1 is not relevant to this so we shall ignore that. We get to the thread migration check. Here, we discover that interesting_thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu = 0, yet interesting_thread->cpu is now 1, indicating thread migration. We set vfp_current_hw_state[1] to NULL. So, at this point vfp_current_hw_state[] contains the following: [0] = &interesting_thread->vfpstate [1] = NULL Our interesting thread now executes a VFP instruction, takes a fault which loads the state into the VFP hardware. Now, through the assembly we now have: [0] = &interesting_thread->vfpstate [1] = &interesting_thread->vfpstate CPU1 stops due to ptrace (and so saves its VFP state) using the thread switch code above), and CPU0 calls vfp_sync_hwstate(). if (vfp_current_hw_state[cpu] == &thread->vfpstate) { vfp_save_state(&thread->vfpstate, fpexc | FPEXC_EN); BANG, we corrupt interesting_thread's VFP state by overwriting the more up-to-date state saved by CPU1 with the old VFP state from CPU0. Fix this by ensuring that we have sane semantics for the various state describing variables: 1. vfp_current_hw_state[] points to the current owner of the context information stored in each CPUs hardware, or NULL if that state information is invalid. 2. thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu always contains the most recent CPU number which the state was loaded into or NR_CPUS if no CPU owns the state. So, for a particular CPU to be a valid owner of the VFP state for a particular thread t, two things must be true: vfp_current_hw_state[cpu] == &t->vfpstate && t->vfpstate.hard.cpu == cpu. and that is valid from the moment a CPU loads the saved VFP context into the hardware. This gives clear and consistent semantics to interpreting these variables. This patch also fixes thread copying, ensuring that t->vfpstate.hard.cpu is invalidated, otherwise CPU0 may believe it was the last owner. The hole can happen thus: - thread1 runs on CPU2 using VFP, migrates to CPU3, exits and thread_info freed. - New thread allocated from a previously running thread on CPU2, reusing memory for thread1 and copying vfp.hard.cpu. At this point, the following are true: new_thread1->vfpstate.hard.cpu == 2 &new_thread1->vfpstate == vfp_current_hw_state[2] Lastly, this also addresses thread flushing in a similar way to thread copying. Hole is: - thread runs on CPU0, using VFP, migrates to CPU1 but does not use VFP. - thread calls execve(), so thread flush happens, leaving vfp_current_hw_state[0] intact. This vfpstate is memset to 0 causing thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu = 0. - thread migrates back to CPU0 before using VFP. At this point, the following are true: thread->vfpstate.hard.cpu == 0 &thread->vfpstate == vfp_current_hw_state[0] Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Lanchon <lanchon@gmail.com>
Prevent a preemption event causing the initialized VFP state being overwritten by ensuring that the VFP hardware access is disabled prior to starting initialization. We can then do this in safety while still allowing preemption to occur. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Lanchon <lanchon@gmail.com>
When the cpu is powered down in a low power mode, the vfp registers may be reset. This patch uses CPU_PM_ENTER and CPU_PM_EXIT notifiers to save and restore the cpu's vfp registers. Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Tested-and-Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Lanchon <lanchon@gmail.com>
During some CPU power modes entered during idle, hotplug and suspend, peripherals located in the CPU power domain, such as the GIC, localtimers, and VFP, may be powered down. Add a notifier chain that allows drivers for those peripherals to be notified before and after they may be reset. Notified drivers can include VFP co-processor, interrupt controller and it's PM extensions, local CPU timers context save/restore which shouldn't be interrupted. Hence CPU PM event APIs must be called with interrupts disabled. Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Tested-and-Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Lanchon <lanchon@gmail.com>
The user VFP state must be preserved (subject to ucontext modifications) across invocation of a signal handler and this is currently handled by vfp_{preserve,restore}_context in signal.c Since this code requires intimate low-level knowledge of the VFP state, this patch moves it into vfpmodule.c. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Lanchon <lanchon@gmail.com>
…handler The ARM PCS mandates that the length and stride bits of the fpscr are cleared on entry to and return from a public interface. Although signal handlers run asynchronously with respect to the interrupted function, the handler itself expects to run as though it has been called like a normal function. This patch updates the state mirroring the VFP hardware before entry to a signal handler so that it adheres to the PCS. Furthermore, we disable VFP to ensure that we trap on any floating point operation performed by the signal handler and synchronise the hardware appropriately. A check is inserted after the signal handler to avoid redundant flushing if VFP was not used. Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Lanchon <lanchon@gmail.com>
Commit ff9a184c ("ARM: 7400/1: vfp: clear fpscr length and stride bits on entry to sig handler") flushes the VFP state prior to entering a signal handler so that a VFP operation inside the handler will trap and force a restore of ABI-compliant registers. Reflushing and disabling VFP on the sigreturn path is predicated on the saved thread state indicating that VFP was used by the handler -- however for SMP platforms this is only set on context-switch, making the check unreliable and causing VFP register corruption in userspace since the register values are not necessarily those restored from the sigframe. This patch unconditionally flushes the VFP state after a signal handler. Since we already perform the flush before the handler and the flushing itself happens lazily, the redundant flush when VFP is not used by the handler is essentially a nop. Reported-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Lanchon <lanchon@gmail.com>
The CPU_DYING notifier is called by cpu stopper task which does not own the context held in the VFP hardware. Calling vfp_force_reload() has no effect. Replace it with clearing vfp_current_hw_state. Signed-off-by: Yuanyuan Zhong <zyy@motorola.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Lanchon <lanchon@gmail.com>
Implements syscore_ops in cpu_pm to call the cpu and cpu cluster notifiers during suspend and resume, allowing drivers receiving the notifications to avoid implementing syscore_ops. Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Tested-and-Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Acked-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Tested-and-Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
When the cpu is powered down in a low power mode, the gic cpu interface may be reset, and when the cpu cluster is powered down, the gic distributor may also be reset. This patch uses CPU_PM_ENTER and CPU_PM_EXIT notifiers to save and restore the gic cpu interface registers, and the CPU_CLUSTER_PM_ENTER and CPU_CLUSTER_PM_EXIT notifiers to save and restore the gic distributor registers. Merge note: Samsung had already applied the changes to struct gic_chip_data, although it still remains in the .c file instead of having been moved to the header. Original-author: Gary King <gking@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Tested-and-Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> Conflicts: arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h Change-Id: I50b5cdd161637ff7b871ac5ffb30d669ec60c662
In low power cpuidle states, the FPU registers get corrupted. By calling cpu_pm_enter, the VFP module gets notified so that it saves the FPU state and restores it from RAM the next time a thread uses it. See http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=57637134. Change-Id: Id3a455b9c7c3ff5e45e9c0cdb04719bb370b87e9
The comments at cpu_pm_enter/exit indicate that these functions must be called with interrupts disabled, so move the calls between local_irq_disable/local_irq_enble. Change-Id: I57ddbb1b0d4c78371ea4cca3142c381942012311
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Commits are result of the patches collected by zeitferne, in post: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=57654708&postcount=833