Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Format of fhirContext not checked #474

Closed
Jammjammjamm opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Format of fhirContext not checked #474

Jammjammjamm opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
add constraint The change may cause a system that previously passed to now fail bug This is a bug in Inferno g10-test-kit This issue affects onc-certification-g10-test-kit smart-app-launch-test-kit This issue affects smart-app-launch-test-kit v4.1.0 Release v4.1.0

Comments

@Jammjammjamm
Copy link
Contributor

fhirContext is an optional field in the SMART App Launch 2.0 token response. Even though it's not a required field, its format should be checked if present.
@Jammjammjamm Jammjammjamm added g10-test-kit This issue affects onc-certification-g10-test-kit smart-app-launch-test-kit This issue affects smart-app-launch-test-kit add constraint The change may cause a system that previously passed to now fail labels Dec 12, 2023
@Jammjammjamm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Addressed by inferno-framework/smart-app-launch-test-kit#56

@yunwwang yunwwang added v4.1.0 Release v4.1.0 bug This is a bug in Inferno labels Feb 5, 2024
@yunwwang yunwwang closed this as completed Feb 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
add constraint The change may cause a system that previously passed to now fail bug This is a bug in Inferno g10-test-kit This issue affects onc-certification-g10-test-kit smart-app-launch-test-kit This issue affects smart-app-launch-test-kit v4.1.0 Release v4.1.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@yunwwang @Jammjammjamm