Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LAPACK][CUSOLVER] Add getri batch funcs #248

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 2, 2023

Conversation

hdelan
Copy link
Contributor

@hdelan hdelan commented Nov 3, 2022

This adds getri batch funcs as well as getri (which calls getri_batch). The GetriBatch funcs are in CUBLAS, not CUSOLVER so some CMake changes were necessary.

Fixes # (GitHub issue)

#229

Clang-formatted and tests passing locally.

I have not included the group funcs in this PR. Should I do so?

@hdelan
Copy link
Contributor Author

hdelan commented Nov 3, 2022

Clarification: I have not added the group USM functions since I don't want to give the user the impression that the group getri is calling some cublas<T>getriBatchedGroup or something similar. I can implement it so that it calls the getri_batch in this PR, although it will be easy enough for the user to do the same. Let me know your thoughts

@sknepper
Copy link
Contributor

Have all comments been addressed?

Copy link

@Alexander-Kleymenov Alexander-Kleymenov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks for the updates!

@hdelan
Copy link
Contributor Author

hdelan commented Apr 5, 2023

Can this get merged?

@abagusetty
Copy link

Can we get this merged.

Copy link
Contributor

@sknepper sknepper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your contributions!

@sknepper sknepper merged commit 57c5f2b into oneapi-src:develop Jun 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants