-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Transaction pre-conditions must also be view
#2171
Transaction pre-conditions must also be view
#2171
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feature/stable-cadence #2171 +/- ##
=======================================================
Coverage 78.20% 78.20%
=======================================================
Files 309 309
Lines 64709 64716 +7
=======================================================
+ Hits 50603 50610 +7
Misses 12316 12316
Partials 1790 1790
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
Cadence Benchstat comparisonThis branch with compared with the base branch onflow:feature/stable-cadence commit 3a0c7b1 Collapsed results for better readability
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch!
While reading over onflow/flips#41 I realized that we did not properly enforce that transaction pre-conditions were
view
. This refactors the checking to push the purity scope in all condition checking locations, covering the missed case.master
branchFiles changed
in the Github PR explorer