Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: make sure LTE and v0.4 emit the same test keys #1392

Merged
merged 119 commits into from
Dec 1, 2023
Merged

Conversation

bassosimone
Copy link
Member

@bassosimone bassosimone commented Nov 22, 2023

This diff switches LTE to use the classic "engine", removes restrictions regarding comparing test keys, and ensures with the existing test suite that LTE and v0.4 produce the same top-level test keys under the same conditions.

While there, let's also bump LTE's version number, lest we forget.

See ooni/probe#2634

We're introducing failure modes that do not exist hence it seems
this is not the correct way of moving forward.
I'm doing this mainly to explore whether we could have more
robust webconnectivity v0.5 analysis code
Because I am dropping the requests again, we break again the tests
with the redirects. I could possibly fix it by putting requests back
again but I am not super happy about doing this because that would
cause the DSL to do some strange work and I'd honestly rather not do this.
what remains to be done now is to make sure we make green all the
tests that are currently skipped

we also need to account for differences between the two
then next step is to sort out this mess :-)
@bassosimone bassosimone changed the title chore: start investigating LTE vs v0.4 feat: make sure LTE and v0.4 emit the same test keys Dec 1, 2023
@bassosimone bassosimone marked this pull request as ready for review December 1, 2023 00:20
@bassosimone bassosimone merged commit b4d03b5 into master Dec 1, 2023
8 of 10 checks passed
@bassosimone bassosimone deleted the issue/2634 branch December 1, 2023 00:52
Murphy-OrangeMud pushed a commit to Murphy-OrangeMud/probe-cli that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
This diff introduces the `minipipeline` package and command. The general
idea here is to analyze experiments results using an architecture that
matches https://github.com/ooni/data as closely as possible.

The advantage of using this architecture is that we can neatly divide
the data analysis process into three phases:

1. ingestion converts an OONI measurement into observations, which are
flat data structures;

2. analysis converts observations into an analysis structure, which is
significantly simpler than observations;

3. scoring is the process (implemented by each experiment) to turn the
analysis into top-level keys.

That is:

```mermaid
stateDiagram-v2
  state "{ingestion}" as ingestion
  MEASUREMENT --> ingestion
  ingestion --> OBSERVATIONS
  state "{analysis}" as analysis
  OBSERVATIONS --> analysis
  analysis --> ANALYSIS
  state "{scoring}" as scoring
  ANALYSIS --> scoring
  scoring --> TOP_LEVEL_KEYS
```

This diff in particular tackles points 1 and 2. We'll implement 3 for
Web Connectivity LTE in a separate diff.

The diff itself commits several observations and analysis files along
with the measurements from which they originate, which we all
collectively use to write regression tests for the `minipipeline`
package.

The motivation for implementing these changes is that I need a more
clearly defined model to address the differences between Web
Connectivity LTE and v0.4 (see also
ooni#1392). Because there is already
an architectural model for implementing these changes in ooni/data, it
seems logical to borrow liberally from ooni/data.

Incidentally, this change has the benefit of making it easier, in the
future, to align ooni/probe-cli and ooni/data.

The reference issue is ooni/probe#2634.
Implementing this change seems now a precondition for implementing extra
changes that would address such an issue for good, by changing LTE's
scoring.

Unlike the ooni/data pipeline, this pipeline is minimal (hence the
name): it only aims to process measurements collected by a recent
version of ooniprobe, rather than all measurements from the beginning of
time.

While there, disable signal integration tests because of
ooni/probe#2636.
Murphy-OrangeMud pushed a commit to Murphy-OrangeMud/probe-cli that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
This diff introduces the qatool, originally developed in
ooni#1392. This tool allows to run
webconnectivitylte netemx-based QA tests and produces the measurement,
observations, and analysis files.

We can use this tool to run individual tests and inspect their results
when they're failing. Additionally, we can use this tool to regenerate
the test suite used by the minipipeline.

When running the tool, we can select which QA tests to run, whether to
rerun netemx and to reprocess. This feature is handy because we don't
need to rerun netemx every time and sometimes we may only want to rerun
netemx.

This work is part of ooni/probe#2634. It helps
us to manage and test the minipipeline and webconnectivitylte in an
easier way, and it enables further development and testing.
Murphy-OrangeMud pushed a commit to Murphy-OrangeMud/probe-cli that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
This diff adds more QA tests extracted from
ooni#1392.

Part of ooni/probe#2634.
Murphy-OrangeMud pushed a commit to Murphy-OrangeMud/probe-cli that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
)

We're not saving "connect" network events when TCP connect fails. This
diff fixes the codebase so that we always save these events.

Fix extracted from ooni#1392.

Reference issue ooni/probe#2634.
Murphy-OrangeMud pushed a commit to Murphy-OrangeMud/probe-cli that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
Murphy-OrangeMud pushed a commit to Murphy-OrangeMud/probe-cli that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
This diff switches LTE to use the classic "engine", removes restrictions
regarding comparing test keys, and ensures with the existing test suite
that LTE and v0.4 produce the same top-level test keys under the same
conditions.

While there, let's also bump LTE's version number, lest we forget.

See ooni/probe#2634
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant