Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow multiline templatization #95

Conversation

willkutler
Copy link
Contributor

Adds a new field, object-templates-raw, that allows users to paste in an object template. This makes multiline templates, like those using the range keyword, possible. It can be set instead of object-templates, but both cannot be set.

ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-2739?filter=-1

Signed-off-by: Will Kutler wkutler@redhat.com

Copy link
Member

@mprahl mprahl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Just a few comments.

api/v1/configurationpolicy_types.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@willkutler
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mprahl thanks for the review! added a comment in the type file and an extra check for status message in the test case

Adds a new field, object-templates-raw, that allows users to paste in an object template. This makes multiline templates, like those using the range keyword, possible. It can be set instead of object-templates, but both cannot be set.

ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-2739?filter=-1

Signed-off-by: Will Kutler <wkutler@redhat.com>
Copy link
Member

@mprahl mprahl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Jan 23, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 23, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mprahl, willkutler

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants