-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suwinet prefill #586
Comments
Refinement: For now, we will just get the data exposed as used-defined variable in Open Forms. You can select "Suwinet" as Prefill plugin. And as attribute, you can select an operation (one of the 16 SOAP-services, which all have 1 operation). ...that can be used in Content-components: The SOAP-calls require 2 attributes: BSN and period. The BSN can be obtained from DigiD but the date is a different matter. I think it's unavoidable to create "settings" for prefill attributes but maybe these settings can be determined during the form... so it takes variables again. Let's postponed this last issue and start with:
|
…-services [#586] Move SOAP services to own module
Refinement: We scoped this ticket to only work with a few of the Suwinet (DKD) requests that can work as prefill, meaning, it can get the information based on the BSN provided by a DigiD login. Specifically, we target the income-related calls. The calls that require (so, when not optional) additional inputs (start date, end date, postal code, etc.) are out of scope. These could be tackled later but require an additional mechanism that doesn't fit prefilling. Rather, it requires "if all inputs are available" then perform the call. |
Trusting the main prefill integration test the binding to variables. And this testing of plugin api is enough. Also dropped the failing test. There is something wonky going on resource leakage due to, I think, threading (requests in a threadpool)/multi processing. Running the whole test suite in reverse with 2 testrunners will trip it sooner than what origin/master shows. raising to 11 runners and random order, lowers the chance of tripping it. I'm hitting the postgres connection limit. And it's unclear to me if this is just due to the way we run the test or if this could happen in production. (no signs of it in Sentry of our OF instances) I'm giving up, kicking the pebble up the road to #3242. Might run a bisect this weekend, when I don't need my machine.
Trusting the main prefill integration test the binding to variables. And this testing of plugin api is enough. Also dropped the failing test. There is something wonky going on resource leakage due to, I think, threading (requests in a threadpool)/multi processing. Running the whole test suite in reverse with 2 testrunners will trip it sooner than what origin/master shows. raising to 11 runners and random order, lowers the chance of tripping it. I'm hitting the postgres connection limit. And it's unclear to me if this is just due to the way we run the test or if this could happen in production. (no signs of it in Sentry of our OF instances) I'm giving up, kicking the pebble up the road to #3242. Might run a bisect this weekend, when I don't need my machine.
About the keymaterial from a path in .env: should we consider using the keychain package, so each platform can use their proper key storage?
About the keymaterial from a path in .env: should we consider using the keychain package, so each platform can use their proper key storage?
- An unresponsive service should not hang the client.
Uses create for the Certificate fields because FactoryBoy build strategy results in unreadable file fields and zeep wsse reads the key and cert material.
About the keymaterial from a path in .env: should we consider using the keychain package, so each platform can use their proper key storage?
Uses create for the Certificate fields because FactoryBoy build strategy results in unreadable file fields and zeep wsse reads the key and cert material.
About the keymaterial from a path in .env: should we consider using the keychain package, so each platform can use their proper key storage?
About the keymaterial from a path in .env: should we consider using the keychain package, so each platform can use their proper key storage?
About the keymaterial from a path in .env: should we consider using the keychain package, so each platform can use their proper key storage?
Als burger van de gemeente wil ik graag dat mijn aanvraagformulieren zoveel mogelijk voor ingevuld worden. Voor het ophalen van data bij de Belastingdienst of bij Suwinet, moet ik hiervoor een juist subOIN meegeven met de serviceaanroep. De aangeroepen servive kan dan controleren of dit verzoek om uitwisseling van data gehonoreerd mag worden.
There are many different APIs in Suwinet:
The responses can contain many nested keys. For example, a person can have multiple salaries + benefits (so the responses would correspond to "arrays of objects" if turned into JSON).
This is problematic because the form designer does not know in advance how much data will come back.
To discuss:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: