Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Move Ops of StyleGAN3 to mmcv #1246

Closed
zengyh1900 opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by open-mmlab/mmcv#2290 or #1383
Closed

[Feature] Move Ops of StyleGAN3 to mmcv #1246

zengyh1900 opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by open-mmlab/mmcv#2290 or #1383
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature request new feature/model/datasets/config etc. priority/P0 highest priority status/WIP work in progress normally
Milestone

Comments

@zengyh1900
Copy link
Collaborator

What is the problem this feature will solve?

Move Ops of StyleGAN3 to mmcv

What is the feature?

Move Ops of StyleGAN3 to mmcv
open-mmlab/mmcv#2290

What alternatives have you considered?

No response

@zengyh1900 zengyh1900 added this to the 1.0.0rc2 milestone Oct 11, 2022
@zengyh1900 zengyh1900 added kind/feature request new feature/model/datasets/config etc. awating response priority/P0 highest priority labels Oct 11, 2022
@plyfager
Copy link
Collaborator

In MMCV: open-mmlab/mmcv#2290

@zengyh1900 zengyh1900 removed the PRed label Oct 14, 2022
@zengyh1900 zengyh1900 linked a pull request Oct 14, 2022 that will close this issue
12 tasks
@zengyh1900 zengyh1900 added the status/WIP work in progress normally label Oct 14, 2022
@plyfager plyfager linked a pull request Oct 31, 2022 that will close this issue
7 tasks
@zengyh1900 zengyh1900 modified the milestones: 1.0.0rc2, 1.0.0rc3 Nov 1, 2022
@Z-Fran Z-Fran closed this as completed Apr 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature request new feature/model/datasets/config etc. priority/P0 highest priority status/WIP work in progress normally
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants