Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[###updated for new question] rcnn_loss don't decline when training on my custum dataset #24

Closed
xzswater opened this issue Apr 1, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@xzswater
Copy link

xzswater commented Apr 1, 2020

As shown on the fig, ### rcnn_loss don't decline sharply; on the contrary, rpn_loss worked well.
So, what are the possible reasons ? Thank you for your suggestion.

pcdet-train-roblem

@sshaoshuai
Copy link
Collaborator

How about the final mAP? Sometimes the rcnn loss curve could not well indicate the training process of the network. Also, the rcnn_fg_num seems too low. Maybe you should check the quality of RPN proposals. And also you could modify the RCNN.TARGET_CONFIG.[REG_FG_THRESH, CLS_FG_THRESH, CLS_BG_THRESH] according to your dataset or classes.

@xzswater xzswater changed the title rcnn_loss don't decline when training on my custum dataset [updated for new question] rcnn_loss don't decline when training on my custum dataset Apr 8, 2020
@xzswater xzswater changed the title [updated for new question] rcnn_loss don't decline when training on my custum dataset [###updated for new question] rcnn_loss don't decline when training on my custum dataset Apr 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants