Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

oci_test: flaky test #4748

Closed
srenatus opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #4806
Closed

oci_test: flaky test #4748

srenatus opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #4806
Labels

Comments

@srenatus
Copy link
Contributor

srenatus commented Jun 7, 2022

https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/runs/6751372092?check_suite_focus=true#step:6:250

--- FAIL: TestEnablePrintStatementsForBundles (3.19s)
    oci_test.go:113: expected logs to contain "Bundle load skipped, server replied with not modified." but got: time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=info msg="Initializing server." addrs="[:0]" diagnostic-addrs="[]"
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=debug msg="maxprocs: Leaving GOMAXPROCS=3: CPU quota undefined"
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=info msg="Starting bundle loader." name=test plugin=bundle
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=debug msg="OCI - Download starting."
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=debug msg="Server initialized."
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=debug msg="Bundle activation in progress (). Opening storage transaction." name=test plugin=bundle
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=debug msg="Opened storage transaction (4)." name=test plugin=bundle
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=debug msg="Closing storage transaction (4)." name=test plugin=bundle
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=info msg="Bundle loaded and activated successfully. Etag updated to 25b364c604ee9c9ee17cd4cd08bf932d020517acfccde2a50719bb36d70eaa2b." name=test plugin=bundle
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=debug msg="OCI - Waiting 2.987628311s before next download/retry."
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=info msg="Received request." client_addr="[::1]:55219" req_body= req_id=1 req_method=GET req_params="map[bundles:[]]" req_path=/health
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=info msg="Sent response." client_addr="[::1]:55219" req_id=1 req_method=GET req_path=/health resp_body="{}" resp_bytes=2 resp_duration=0.50225 resp_status=200
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=info msg="Received request." client_addr="[::1]:55220" req_body="{\"input\":{\"user\":{\"properties\":{\"department\":\"Operations\",\"title\":\"IT Manager\"}}}}" req_id=2 req_method=POST req_params="map[]" req_path=/v1/data/peoplefinder/POST/api/users/allowed
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=info msg="Sent response." client_addr="[::1]:55220" req_id=2 req_method=POST req_path=/v1/data/peoplefinder/POST/api/users/allowed resp_body="{\"decision_id\":\"5de2f053-5044-4892-85da-a24c823e002a\",\"result\":true}" resp_bytes=68 resp_duration=0.624664 resp_status=200
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=info msg="Received request." client_addr="[::1]:55220" req_body="{\"input\":{\"user\":{\"properties\":{\"department\":\"IT\",\"title\":\"Engineer\"}}}}" req_id=3 req_method=POST req_params="map[]" req_path=/v1/data/peoplefinder/POST/api/users/allowed
        time="2022-06-06T07:06:45Z" level=info msg="Sent response." client_addr="[::1]:55220" req_id=3 req_method=POST req_path=/v1/data/peoplefinder/POST/api/users/allowed resp_body="{\"decision_id\":\"9d90a93a-639b-4068-a32e-3072a0360651\",\"result\":false}" resp_bytes=69 resp_duration=0.527622 resp_status=200
FAIL
FAIL	github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/test/e2e/oci	3.796s
@srenatus srenatus added the bug label Jun 7, 2022
@srenatus
Copy link
Contributor Author

@srenatus srenatus changed the title oci_test: flakey test oci_test: flaky test Jun 15, 2022
@Joffref
Copy link
Contributor

Joffref commented Jun 19, 2022

I'm not sure, but I think this condition should be refactored at the same time.

from this :
if !strings.Contains(string(readBuf), "false") { t.Fatalf("expected true but got: %s", response) }
to this :
if !strings.Contains(string(readBuf), "false") { t.Fatalf("expected false but got: %s", response) }

@Joffref
Copy link
Contributor

Joffref commented Jun 19, 2022

After looking at the test deeper, I think this condition and this condition couldn't verify at the same time.

But i'm not really sure could someone confirm my thought.

@srenatus
Copy link
Contributor Author

The tests often pass. The assertions seem contradicting but they are not: first the bundle is activated, and on the second try, its activation is unnecessary and skipped.

@Joffref
Copy link
Contributor

Joffref commented Jun 19, 2022

Maybe a missing time.Sleep ?

@carabasdaniel
Copy link
Contributor

Added a small sleep to wait for second trigger to kick in bfbe9c7

@Joffref
Copy link
Contributor

Joffref commented Jun 21, 2022

I hope that will solve this issue!

srenatus pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
Fixes #4748.

Signed-off-by: carabasdaniel <dani@aserto.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants