Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

aws: support for Unsigned Payload or provided content sha256 in AWS signing (#6581) #6611

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

prasanthj
Copy link

To support uses cases where OPA is used for signing s3 requests whose payload is not known upfront or payload is big enough (big file upload) to be sent over wire, this PR adds support for unsigned payloads.

AWS signer has configurable option to use unsigned payload where the x-amz-content-sha256 is set to "UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD" and is included as part of signing process. This PR provides an option for unsigned payload if aws_config.disable_payload_signing is set to true. If payload signing is disabled, SignV4 method will not compute the content sha from the request body but instead use "UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD" string literal for x-amz-content-sha256 header during signature computation.

References:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/sig-v4-header-based-auth.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/sigv4-auth-using-authorization-header.html

Solves #6581

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 5, 2024

Deploy Preview for openpolicyagent ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 37c2da8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/openpolicyagent/deploys/65eb5ce5c0cc7d0008c8e6de
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-6611--openpolicyagent.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@prasanthj prasanthj force-pushed the pr-6581 branch 3 times, most recently from de595d2 to 177d177 Compare March 5, 2024 19:27
Copy link
Member

@ashutosh-narkar ashutosh-narkar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on this @prasanthj. From the approach described by @philipaconrad here, I was thinking the user would simply set the value of the x-amz-content-sha256 header in the headers field of the providers.aws.sign_req builtin and we would overwrite the computed value if that header exists. If we do that then we don't need a new AWS config parameter (disable_payload_signing). Am I missing something?

topdown/providers.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -997,6 +998,7 @@ The `aws_config` object parameter may contain the following fields:
| `aws_service` | yes | `string` | AWS service the request will be valid for. (e.g. `"s3"`) |
| `aws_region` | yes | `string` | AWS region for the request. (e.g. `"us-east-1"`) |
| `aws_session_token` | no | `string` | AWS security token. Used for the `x-amz-security-token` request header. |
| `disable_payload_signing` | no | `boolean` | When `true` an `UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD` value will be used for calculating the `x-amz-content-sha256` header during signing, and will be returned in the response. Default: `false`. |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For consistency should we prefix this option with aws like the others?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since it is already under aws_config, not sure if aws_ prefix is required. This config is also more specific to s3 and not generic like other configs.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This config is also more specific to s3 and not generic like other configs.

If that's the case, we should at least update the description to clarify that.

@prasanthj
Copy link
Author

prasanthj commented Mar 6, 2024

Sorry I should have put that up in description. I was also suggesting that approach initially to use whatever is the provided header but it turns out to be a change in behavior. The change in behavior is, prior to this PR even if content sha is provided via headers it will not be used during signing as content sha is always computed from body. If provided headers contain content sha and if we start using it, it would cause change in behavior. There could be some users out there who would be using it and it would suddenly cause change in signature after this change. To avoid changing the behavior, enabling this feature explicitly via config option. This also aligns with how AWS SDK is doing.

@@ -986,17 +987,18 @@ The following fields will have effects on the output `Authorization` header sign
| `method` | yes | `string` | HTTP method to specify in request. Used in the signature. |
| `body` | no | `any` | HTTP message body. The JSON serialized version of this value will be used for the payload portion of the signature if present. |
| `raw_body` | no | `string` | HTTP message body. This will be used for the payload portion of the signature if present. |
| `headers` | no | `object` | HTTP headers to include in the request. These will be added to the list of headers to sign. |
| `headers` | no | `object` | HTTP headers to include in the request. These will be added to the list of headers to sign. If `aws_config.disable_payload_signing` is set to `true` then `UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD` string will be used as value for `x-amz-content-sha256` header during the signing process (any provided value for `x-amz-content-sha256` header will be discarded when payload signing is disabled).|
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(any provided value for x-amz-content-sha256 header will be discarded when payload signing is disabled).

This does not seem to be the case looking at the code. If the request's headers contains x-amz-content-sha256, it will override the computed or static (ie. UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD) value and the provided value will be used for signing.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm looking at this line.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch. This comment is stale and was carried over from the initial implementation which did not use explicit config. I will remove this comment.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool. Please also update the docs to reflect this behavior. Also an example in the builtins page would be helpful. Thanks.

The [AWS S3 request signing API](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/sig-v4-header-based-auth.html)
supports unsigned payload signing option. This example below shows s3 request signing with payload signing disabled.

```live:providers/aws/sign_req_basic:module
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You'll need to rename this to get the website to build. sign_req_basic:module -> sign_req_unsign:module for instance.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

Copy link
Member

@ashutosh-narkar ashutosh-narkar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@prasanthj the changes lgtm. If you can address the comment about the docs and squash your commits, we can get this in. Thanks!

…igning (open-policy-agent#6581)

To support uses cases where OPA is used for signing s3 requests whose payload is
not known upfront or payload is big enough (big file upload) to be sent over wire,
this PR adds support for unsigned payloads.

AWS signer has configurable option to use unsigned payload where the
x-amz-content-sha256 is set to "UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD" and is included as part
of signing process. This PR provides an option for unsigned payload if
aws_config.disable_payload_signing is set to true. If payload signing is
disabled, SignV4 method will not compute the content sha from the request body
but instead use "UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD" string literal for x-amz-content-sha256
header during signature computation.

References:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/sig-v4-header-based-auth.html
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/sigv4-auth-using-authorization-header.html
Signed-off-by: Prasanth Jayachandran <p_jayachandran@apple.com>
Copy link
Member

@ashutosh-narkar ashutosh-narkar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks @prasanthj!

@ashutosh-narkar ashutosh-narkar merged commit 7f5e3a9 into open-policy-agent:main Mar 8, 2024
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants