Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use ament_cmake_uncrustify #39

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2021
Merged

Conversation

Yadunund
Copy link
Member

@Yadunund Yadunund commented Nov 12, 2021

We currently have the rmf_cmake_uncrustify package that is used for style checking with colcon test. The original reason for having this package and not using ament_cmake_uncrustify was that the latter did not support custom uncrustify configuration files. But this feature was merged upstream quite a while ago and has been part of foxy and galactic releases. Hence, switching back to ament_cmake_uncrustify for ease of maintenance and distribution.

Signed-off-by: Yadunund <yadunund@openrobotics.org>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 12, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #39 (0b03650) into main (351e78c) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main     #39   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.00%   0.00%           
=====================================
  Files         21      21           
  Lines       4230    4230           
=====================================
  Misses      4230    4230           
Flag Coverage Δ
tests 0.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Copy link
Member

@aaronchongth aaronchongth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested and working, thanks for the changes! LGTM

@aaronchongth aaronchongth merged commit 4d4933a into main Nov 12, 2021
@aaronchongth aaronchongth deleted the use_ament_cmake_uncrustify branch November 12, 2021 09:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants