Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.0.1.0.0][stock_pull_rule_picking_type] #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2017

Conversation

andhit-r
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 22, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-2.3%) to 43.228% when pulling 42ccb45 on 8.0-stock_pull_rule_picking_type into 127586a on 8.0.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 22, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #25 into 8.0 will decrease coverage by 2.26%.
The diff coverage is 21.56%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              8.0      #25      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   45.49%   43.22%   -2.27%     
==========================================
  Files          21       23       +2     
  Lines         488      539      +51     
==========================================
+ Hits          222      233      +11     
- Misses        266      306      +40
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
..._pull_rule_picking_type/models/procurement_rule.py 100% <100%> (ø)
...pull_rule_picking_type/models/procurement_order.py 14.89% <14.89%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 127586a...42ccb45. Read the comment docs.

@andhit-r andhit-r merged commit 66c7e1f into 8.0 May 22, 2017
@andhit-r andhit-r deleted the 8.0-stock_pull_rule_picking_type branch January 27, 2018 04:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants