Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.0.1.0.0] stock_picking_invoice_journal_policy #45

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2019

Conversation

andhit-r
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@andhit-r andhit-r merged commit 2022da8 into 8.0 Jan 27, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 27, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #45 into 8.0 will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 52.17%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              8.0     #45      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   49.64%   49.7%   +0.05%     
=========================================
  Files          46      48       +2     
  Lines         989    1012      +23     
=========================================
+ Hits          491     503      +12     
- Misses        498     509      +11
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...nvoice_journal_policy/models/stock_picking_type.py 100% <100%> (ø)
...journal_policy/wizards/stock_invoice_onshipping.py 38.88% <38.88%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0ab5dba...9c8375d. Read the comment docs.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 49.704% when pulling 9c8375d on 8.0.1.0.0-stock_picking_invoice_journal_policy into 0ab5dba on 8.0.

@andhit-r andhit-r deleted the 8.0.1.0.0-stock_picking_invoice_journal_policy branch December 21, 2019 04:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants