Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(fluentforwardreceiver): support more complex fluent-bit objects #5676

Merged

Conversation

sumo-drosiek
Copy link
Member

Description:

  • use same way to parse attributes and to parse body
  • parse more complex flunet-bit objects as AttributeValue (instead of string)

Link to tracking Issue:

#5674

Testing:

  • unit tests
  • manual functional tests

Documentation:

N/A

rv := pdata.NewAttributeValueMap()
am := rv.MapVal()
am.EnsureCapacity(len(msi))

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Strange layout, new line or not in both funcs :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be consistent now 😅

Signed-off-by: Dominik Rosiek <drosiek@sumologic.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Rosiek <drosiek@sumologic.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Oct 21, 2021
@jpkrohling
Copy link
Member

@bogdandrutu, I think this is on you now :-)

@jpkrohling jpkrohling added ready to merge Code review completed; ready to merge by maintainers and removed Stale labels Oct 21, 2021
Copy link
Member

@dmitryax dmitryax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

receiver/fluentforwardreceiver/conversion.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready to merge Code review completed; ready to merge by maintainers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants