Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auto-instrumentation for JaxWS #2176

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 4, 2021
Merged

Conversation

vovencij
Copy link
Contributor

@vovencij vovencij commented Feb 2, 2021

JaxWS is a set of APIs for SOAP WebServices. This PR adds auto-instrumentation for

  • @javax.jws.WebService annotation from Java Web Services Metadata (separate library, but jaxws assumes it is present) used to define a web-service,
  • javax.xml.ws.Provider interface from Jax WS API, alternative way of handling SOAP messages.

@iNikem
Copy link
Contributor

iNikem commented Feb 3, 2021

Please update README as well

group = "javax.xml.ws"
module = "jaxws-api"
versions = "[2.0,]"
skipVersions += '2.1-1' // contains broken dependency
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it make sense to add assertInverse = true?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure it is needed. The API is very stable, even version 2.0 is from 2006 or something. Current is 2.3. And I couldn't find 1.0. Then it all moved to jakarta and in November 2020 they released new versions of all java EE components (Java EE 9), where packages were changed to jakarta... instead of javax.... So all existing Java EE instrumentations will have to be revisited to support Java EE 9 with new package names...

@anuraaga anuraaga merged commit a0d6678 into open-telemetry:main Feb 4, 2021
@vovencij vovencij deleted the jax-ws branch February 4, 2021 06:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants