Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix requests and urllib instrumentations span name callback parameters #259

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Dec 16, 2020

Conversation

lzchen
Copy link
Contributor

@lzchen lzchen commented Dec 15, 2020

Addresses this comment

@lzchen lzchen requested a review from a team as a code owner December 15, 2020 18:28
@lzchen lzchen requested review from toumorokoshi and hectorhdzg and removed request for a team December 15, 2020 18:28
@lzchen lzchen added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label Dec 15, 2020
Copy link
Member

@toumorokoshi toumorokoshi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks.

@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ def _instrumented_requests_call(
method = method.upper()
span_name = ""
if name_callback is not None:
span_name = name_callback()
span_name = name_callback(method, url)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a thought that although this is sufficient for the vast majority of cases, I have a feeling people may want to customize the span name further later on.

For example, one cannot extracted values from the header and add them to the span name.

I don't have a great solution (besides passing in all args via **kwargs, etc), but this may come up as an issue.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I thought of that too. For now, I think this is sufficient and we can change the parameters if the need arises.

@toumorokoshi
Copy link
Member

QQ: why does this have the "Skip Changelog" tag? this is a new feature being added to the requests / urllib instrumentations. or at least a bugfix.

@lzchen lzchen removed the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label Dec 16, 2020
@lzchen lzchen merged commit 65801c3 into open-telemetry:master Dec 16, 2020
@lzchen lzchen deleted the hooks branch December 16, 2020 16:17
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
([#242](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python-contrib/pull/242))
- `opentelemetry-instrumentation-flask` Do not emit a warning message for request contexts created with `app.test_request_context`
([#253](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python-contrib/pull/253))
- `opentelemetry-instrumentation-requests`, `opentelemetry-instrumentation-urllib` Fix span name callback parameters
- ([#259](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python-contrib/pull/259))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that there's an extra dash on line 43 here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably will be fixed in a new pr

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants