Document issue triage labels #3990
Conversation
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
|
Closed as inactive. Feel free to reopen if this PR is still being worked on. |
|
This process is still be trialled by the GC so I it's still applicable. |
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
|
I believe this is ready for review. Not much has changed but we've been using this process for a while without issue now. It can be extended in the future as we refine the process. |
|
@dyladan this PR seems to focus on the definition of the roles and tags, it doesn't cover how the state machine would work - e.g. the diagram in this issue description #3821. Do you intend to make this a complete PR by adding the state machine or keeping it small? If the answer is the latter, consider updating the PR title and description. |
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
issue-management.md
Outdated
| - Collaborator: | ||
| - Person(s) that are actually doing the work related to the ticket. Once work is done, | ||
| they work with the Reviewer to get feedback implemented and complete the work. They | ||
| are responsible for making sure issue status labels are up to date. | ||
| - Reviewer: | ||
| - Person whose Approval is needed to merge the PR. | ||
| - Sponsor: | ||
| - This person, typically a technical committee member or someone the TC has assigned, is responsible for the completion of the issue. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
there's a slightly refined definition in open-telemetry/community#2070
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you think it would be better to simply link to that page for all roles instead of redefining them here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@trask would you take a look and see if this can be resolved? Thanks!
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
|
I'll update it today so it can be merged |
|
@trask Maybe a last look/iteration? |
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
|
Closed as inactive. Feel free to reopen if this PR is still being worked on. |
Relates to #3821
The GC is currently working on a new process for triaging and prioritizing the specification issue backlog. This document outlines the process and the labels currently being used.