Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting naming convention for exporter packages #629

Merged

Conversation

toumorokoshi
Copy link
Member

There is an implicit convention around exporter packages in several
language instrumentations. Adding the convention to the spec standardizes
the convention.

There is an implicit convention around exporter packages in several
language instrumentations. Adding the convention to the spec standardizes
the convention.
Copy link
Member

@arminru arminru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

specification/library-guidelines.md Show resolved Hide resolved
specification/library-guidelines.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
- modifying wording for exporter packages to have prefixes
- fixing link naming
- adding entry to changelog
@bogdandrutu
Copy link
Member

@toumorokoshi please rebase and fix all comments :)

@carlosalberto carlosalberto added the area:semantic-conventions Related to semantic conventions label Jun 12, 2020
@toumorokoshi
Copy link
Member Author

@bogdandrutu done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:semantic-conventions Related to semantic conventions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants