fmt

xtokens/src/lib.rs

@@ -492,10 +492,10 @@ pub mod module {
 				}
 			}
 
-			// In case that fee reserve != asset reserve, there are two xcm sent from sender.
-			// first xcm sent to fee reserve chain which route to dest chain. second xcm directly
-			// sent to dest chain. the fee amount in fee asset is split into two parts.
-			// 1. fee asset sent to fee reserve chain = fee_amount - min_xcm_fee
+			// In case that fee reserve != asset reserve, there are two xcm sent from
+			// sender. first xcm sent to fee reserve chain which route to dest chain. second
+			// xcm directly sent to dest chain. the fee amount in fee asset is split into
+			// two parts. 1. fee asset sent to fee reserve chain = fee_amount - min_xcm_fee
 			// 2. fee asset sent to dest reserve chain = min_xcm_fee
 			// the first part + second part = fee amount in fee asset
 			let fee_reserve = fee.reserve();
@@ -528,9 +528,9 @@ pub mod module {
 				// First xcm sent to fee reserve chain and routed to dest chain.
 				// The `SelfLocation` current is (1, Parachain(id)) refer to sender parachain.
 				// we use `SelfLocation` to fund fee to sender's parachain sovereign account on
-				// destination chain, which asset is originated from sender account on sender chain.
-				// This means if user setup too much fee, the fee is not returned to user, instead
-				// deposit to sibling parachain sovereign account on dest chain.
+				// destination chain, which asset is originated from sender account on sender
+				// chain. This means if user setup too much fee, the fee is not returned to
+				// user, instead deposit to sibling parachain sovereign account on dest chain.
 				// Notice: if parachain set `SelfLocation` to (0, Here), it'll be error!
 				Self::send_xcm(
 					origin_location.clone(),
@@ -543,12 +543,12 @@ pub mod module {
 				)?;
 
 				// Second xcm send to dest chain.
-				// Current not ensure xcm order delivery. if second xcm is first executed before first
-				// xcm, then second xcm may failed because of sibling parachain account don't have enough
-				// fee to withdraw, but we can pre-fund some amount to sibling parachain sovereign
-				// account to fix this case. as first xcm executed later on, the sibling
-				// sovereign parachain account get top up. and next transaction will succeed even though
-				// second xcm is executed before first xcm.
+				// Current not ensure xcm order delivery. if second xcm is first executed before
+				// first xcm, then second xcm may failed because of sibling parachain account
+				// don't have enough fee to withdraw, but we can pre-fund some amount to sibling
+				// parachain sovereign account to fix this case. as first xcm executed later on,
+				// the sibling sovereign parachain account get top up. and next transaction will
+				// succeed even though second xcm is executed before first xcm.
 				Self::send_xcm(
 					origin_location,
 					assets_to_dest,

xtokens/src/tests.rs

@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ fn sending_sibling_asset_to_reserve_sibling_with_relay_fee_works() {
 			RelayBalances::free_balance(&para_a_account())
 		);
 		assert_eq!(
-			fee_amount - dest_weight*2,
+			fee_amount - dest_weight * 2,
 			RelayBalances::free_balance(&para_b_account())
 		);
 	});
@@ -752,18 +752,15 @@ fn sending_sibling_asset_to_reserve_sibling_with_relay_fee_not_enough() {
 			RelayBalances::free_balance(&para_a_account())
 		);
 		assert_eq!(
-			fee_amount - dest_weight*2,
+			fee_amount - dest_weight * 2,
 			RelayBalances::free_balance(&para_b_account())
 		);
 	});
 
 	ParaB::execute_with(|| {
 		// after first xcm succeed, sibling_a amount = 159-120=39
 		// second xcm failed, so sibling_a amount stay same.
-		assert_eq!(
-			39,
-			ParaTokens::free_balance(CurrencyId::R, &sibling_a_account())
-		);
+		assert_eq!(39, ParaTokens::free_balance(CurrencyId::R, &sibling_a_account()));
 
 		// second xcm failed, so recipient account don't receive any token of B and R.
 		assert_eq!(0, ParaTokens::free_balance(CurrencyId::B, &BOB));