New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please restore symlinks for base images #29
Comments
@hwoarang I am not sure I understand the issue. So the problem you have is that AFAICT this tarball naming convention was only applied to automate the submission to the official docker library within our own internal CI and workflow. Since we are not using this CI anymore we just felt free to modify tarball names, as we do not rely in any convention anymore. Probably @Vogtinator can give you further advise on how this will look like in the future and establish some criteria, but I still doubt this is the best way to proceed. Couldn't you rely on what is in docker-library/official-images/library/opensuse and extract all the information you need (like were are the tarballs and how are named) from there? After all this is the official publicly available data to reproduce what you'd get with a |
@davidcassany yeah we were using
so we were hoping for some static filenames for openSUSE too. If that's not possible then I can simply download and parse the tarball build number from the Dockerfile |
This repository won't be maintained in the future - it's only kept until 42.3 is EOL to submit security updates. I recommend you to build an image specifically for your purpose - you can start by branching the official containers on OBS. For static filenames, you can simply use a |
I see. Sadly building such tarballs is outside the scope of our projects so we were looking to simply consume something published from distributions directly. Thank you for the reply. We will try to look for alternative rootfs tarballs for our containers. |
openSUSE changed the way the base container tarballs are being named so we need to parse the Dockerfile to find out which build is available for download. Change-Id: Ib64dcbc960df7d369d202ce8cf7bdc29b3ee0e0a Link: openSUSE/docker-containers-build#29
Sounds like something openSUSE could provide officially - can you file a bug report with your requirements? |
This is a shame, and we're sorry to see openSUSE go, but for the benefit of your users, could you please update https://github.com/docker-library/docs to include For current examples of cc @yosifkit |
Yes, this will happen after the new workflow for Leap 15.0 is in place. For now |
Thanks for clarifying! ❤️ 👍 |
It seems like #28 removed the various
openSUSE-Leap-42.3.base.$arch.tar.xz
symlinks and this breaks some OpenStack services which were depending on them. Could you please restore them?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: