We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If you're unlucky a dangling sprocket manifest can lead to the app being unable to serve assets. I just had this:
public/assets/.sprockets-manifest-f7b474132b17e060b63dc139c7c4c265.json public/assets/.sprockets-manifest-f105d3d7fe2d4512811565989b31f6e2.json
f10... is the dangling one, f7b the one from the package. This lead the app to pick up f10... and to unserable assets.
f10...
f7b
Interestingly this manifest is dangling for a long time and before the package update it was this situation:
public/assets/.sprockets-manifest-d24617ec3c9c90a8b0a0f1de3d1624f5.json public/assets/.sprockets-manifest-f105d3d7fe2d4512811565989b31f6e2.json
where it was not a problem. We had this in production once already and I just came across this on another instance in an update to 2.9 via packages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I guess we should at least warn about dangling manifest files during the package installation/update...
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
If you're unlucky a dangling sprocket manifest can lead to the app being unable to serve assets. I just had this:
f10...
is the dangling one,f7b
the one from the package. This lead the app to pick upf10...
and to unserable assets.Interestingly this manifest is dangling for a long time and before the package update it was this situation:
where it was not a problem. We had this in production once already and I just came across this on another instance in an update to 2.9 via packages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: