Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2.10 backport] Make editor big where needed #8590

Conversation

Conan-Kudo
Copy link
Member

@Conan-Kudo Conan-Kudo commented Oct 17, 2019

This way the editor textarea gets maximized most of the times, that is what users want.
Don't show always the bottom box. We prefer to see more from the editor textarea.

Originally authored by @hellcp and @eduardoj

Backported from #7958.

(cherry picked from commit eb30e4a)

This way the editor textarea gets maximized most of the times, that is
what users want.
Don't show always the bottom box. We prefer to see more from the
editor textarea.

Co-authored-by: Eduardo Navarro <enavarro@suse.com>

(cherry picked from commit eb30e4a)
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #8590 into 2.10 will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             2.10    #8590      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.68%   90.77%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         501      501              
  Lines       21381    21381              
==========================================
+ Hits        19389    19408      +19     
+ Misses       1992     1973      -19

@hennevogel
Copy link
Member

The hakiri issue has been dealt with in another PR.

@hennevogel hennevogel merged commit 647e2a9 into openSUSE:2.10 Oct 18, 2019
@Conan-Kudo Conan-Kudo deleted the backport-2.10-make_editor_bigger_where_needed branch October 18, 2019 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants