Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FastAPI vs quart #1

Open
transitive-bullshit opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

FastAPI vs quart #1

transitive-bullshit opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@transitive-bullshit
Copy link

I'm wondering what your thoughts are on the tradeoffs between quart and fastapi.

In my understanding, the hardest part of plugin development by far is maintaining the accompanying OpenAPI spec, which is what FastAPI excels at.

It looks like Quart has some support for OpenAPI via quart-openapi, but it's not maintained, and it doesn't have nearly the same developer community as FastAPI.

Def not saying you should be using one or the other; I'd just like to understand the tradeoffs from OpenAI's perspective since I think setting a high quality precedent for how people will start building ChatGPT Pluginsn early is really important.

Thanks! 🙏

@grexzen
Copy link

grexzen commented Sep 6, 2023

FastAPI is easier to work with since you can use Swagger to confirm everything works, and the spec gets created automatically. Now if they just fixed localhost plugins, I would be happy.

@konvio
Copy link

konvio commented Nov 19, 2023

From creator of Quart, QuartSchema is the way to generate OpenAPI spec.

https://pgjones.dev/blog/fastapi-flask-quart-2022/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants