-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extensible seal mechanism #16
Comments
@bnevis-i This sounds like an interesting and potentially valuable feature, but also one that will take a non-trivial amount of work to implement. If so, do we have a "Sponsor User" in mind who is looking to use this who can help inform requirements and facilitate acceptance testing? |
I can't really meet the needs of what @joewxboy is looking for, however I'm definitely interested in helping make this happen. This is a feature I've been looking for in the past. |
I think these are two separate discussion topics, do you mind splitting them into two? |
I could be mistaken, but I do not think that the current seal mechanism is extensible. It would be useful, in IoT scenarios for example, to be able to support hardware seals that aren't enterprise HSM's (for example, a TPM 2.0 seal).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: