ImageDefinition or ContainerImage?

[stain]

The ImageDefinition example uses a type ImageDefinition which seems to be a rehash of ContainerImage

Should this be ImageDefinition or ContainerImage? The use of definition sounds odd given that it is about the container image - not it's definition/recipe! (Any schema.org metadata necessarily is a description). Also Image can be a photo, which would be misleading here.

[vsoch]

Very good question! They are in fact essentially the same - the names / specifications went through a lot of discussion on the opencontainers list - and largely many had opinions and ImageDefinition was suggested. My preference was for ContainerImage (hence why it's still here) and for the exact reasons you mentioned, but ImageDefinition remained as an artifact of the previous discussion. I'll rename the example to match what (at least we agree) is a better direction.

[vsoch]

And sidenote - asking people for suggestions on a list is a terrible way to get consensus... something something too many cooks. :)

[vsoch]

okay, just updated #5