fib6_walk_continue: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 12005456 #101
Comments
This was referenced Aug 26, 2016
Closed
SteveLinCH
pushed a commit
to SteveLinCH/linux
that referenced
this issue
Oct 26, 2016
commit 07d2390 upstream. In certain probe conditions the interrupt came right after registering the handler causing a NULL pointer exception because of uninitialized waitqueue: $ udevadm trigger i2c-gpio i2c-gpio-1: using pins 143 (SDA) and 144 (SCL) i2c-gpio i2c-gpio-3: using pins 53 (SDA) and 52 (SCL) Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 pgd = e8b38000 [00000000] *pgd=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM Modules linked in: snd_soc_i2s(+) i2c_gpio(+) snd_soc_idma snd_soc_s3c_dma snd_soc_core snd_pcm_dmaengine snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore ac97_bus spi_s3c64xx pwm_samsung dwc2 exynos_adc phy_exynos_usb2 exynosdrm exynos_rng rng_core rtc_s3c CPU: 0 PID: 717 Comm: data-provider-m Not tainted 4.6.0-rc1-next-20160401-00011-g1b8d87473b9e-dirty openbmc#101 Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree) (...) (__wake_up_common) from [<c0379624>] (__wake_up+0x38/0x4c) (__wake_up) from [<c0a41d30>] (ak8975_irq_handler+0x28/0x30) (ak8975_irq_handler) from [<c0386720>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x140) (handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c038681c>] (handle_irq_event+0x44/0x68) (handle_irq_event) from [<c0389c40>] (handle_edge_irq+0xf0/0x19c) (handle_edge_irq) from [<c0385e04>] (generic_handle_irq+0x24/0x34) (generic_handle_irq) from [<c05ee360>] (exynos_eint_gpio_irq+0x50/0x68) (exynos_eint_gpio_irq) from [<c0386720>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x140) (handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c038681c>] (handle_irq_event+0x44/0x68) (handle_irq_event) from [<c0389a70>] (handle_fasteoi_irq+0xb4/0x194) (handle_fasteoi_irq) from [<c0385e04>] (generic_handle_irq+0x24/0x34) (generic_handle_irq) from [<c03860b4>] (__handle_domain_irq+0x5c/0xb4) (__handle_domain_irq) from [<c0301774>] (gic_handle_irq+0x54/0x94) (gic_handle_irq) from [<c030c910>] (__irq_usr+0x50/0x80) The bug was reproduced on exynos4412-trats2 (with a max77693 device also using i2c-gpio) after building max77693 as a module. Fixes: 94a6d5c ("iio:ak8975 Implement data ready interrupt handling") Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Tested-by: Gregor Boirie <gregor.boirie@parrot.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Closed
amboar
pushed a commit
to amboar/linux
that referenced
this issue
Apr 7, 2017
We cannot do printk() from tk_debug_account_sleep_time(), because tk_debug_account_sleep_time() is called under tk_core seq lock. The reason why printk() is unsafe there is that console_sem may invoke scheduler (up()->wake_up_process()->activate_task()), which, in turn, can return back to timekeeping code, for instance, via get_time()->ktime_get(), deadlocking the system on tk_core seq lock. [ 48.950592] ====================================================== [ 48.950622] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 48.950622] 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170213+ openbmc#101 Not tainted [ 48.950622] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 48.950622] kworker/0:0/3 is trying to acquire lock: [ 48.950653] (tk_core){----..}, at: [<c01cc624>] retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90 [ 48.950683] but task is already holding lock: [ 48.950683] (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01cc610>] retrigger_next_event+0x38/0x90 [ 48.950714] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 48.950714] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 48.950714] -> openbmc#5 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}: [ 48.950744] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64 [ 48.950775] lock_hrtimer_base+0x28/0x58 [ 48.950775] hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x20/0x5c8 [ 48.950775] __enqueue_rt_entity+0x320/0x360 [ 48.950805] enqueue_rt_entity+0x2c/0x44 [ 48.950805] enqueue_task_rt+0x24/0x94 [ 48.950836] ttwu_do_activate+0x54/0xc0 [ 48.950836] try_to_wake_up+0x248/0x5c8 [ 48.950836] __setup_irq+0x420/0x5f0 [ 48.950836] request_threaded_irq+0xdc/0x184 [ 48.950866] devm_request_threaded_irq+0x58/0xa4 [ 48.950866] omap_i2c_probe+0x530/0x6a0 [ 48.950897] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xb0 [ 48.950897] driver_probe_device+0x1f8/0x2cc [ 48.950897] __driver_attach+0xc0/0xc4 [ 48.950927] bus_for_each_dev+0x6c/0xa0 [ 48.950927] bus_add_driver+0x100/0x210 [ 48.950927] driver_register+0x78/0xf4 [ 48.950958] do_one_initcall+0x3c/0x16c [ 48.950958] kernel_init_freeable+0x20c/0x2d8 [ 48.950958] kernel_init+0x8/0x110 [ 48.950988] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 [ 48.950988] -> openbmc#4 (&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock){-.-...}: [ 48.951019] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50 [ 48.951019] rq_offline_rt+0x9c/0x2bc [ 48.951019] set_rq_offline.part.2+0x2c/0x58 [ 48.951049] rq_attach_root+0x134/0x144 [ 48.951049] cpu_attach_domain+0x18c/0x6f4 [ 48.951049] build_sched_domains+0xba4/0xd80 [ 48.951080] sched_init_smp+0x68/0x10c [ 48.951080] kernel_init_freeable+0x160/0x2d8 [ 48.951080] kernel_init+0x8/0x110 [ 48.951080] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 [ 48.951110] -> openbmc#3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}: [ 48.951110] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50 [ 48.951141] task_fork_fair+0x30/0x124 [ 48.951141] sched_fork+0x194/0x2e0 [ 48.951141] copy_process.part.5+0x448/0x1a20 [ 48.951171] _do_fork+0x98/0x7e8 [ 48.951171] kernel_thread+0x2c/0x34 [ 48.951171] rest_init+0x1c/0x18c [ 48.951202] start_kernel+0x35c/0x3d4 [ 48.951202] 0x8000807c [ 48.951202] -> openbmc#2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}: [ 48.951232] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64 [ 48.951232] try_to_wake_up+0x30/0x5c8 [ 48.951232] up+0x4c/0x60 [ 48.951263] __up_console_sem+0x2c/0x58 [ 48.951263] console_unlock+0x3b4/0x650 [ 48.951263] vprintk_emit+0x270/0x474 [ 48.951293] vprintk_default+0x20/0x28 [ 48.951293] printk+0x20/0x30 [ 48.951324] kauditd_hold_skb+0x94/0xb8 [ 48.951324] kauditd_thread+0x1a4/0x56c [ 48.951324] kthread+0x104/0x148 [ 48.951354] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 [ 48.951354] -> openbmc#1 ((console_sem).lock){-.....}: [ 48.951385] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64 [ 48.951385] down_trylock+0xc/0x2c [ 48.951385] __down_trylock_console_sem+0x24/0x80 [ 48.951385] console_trylock+0x10/0x8c [ 48.951416] vprintk_emit+0x264/0x474 [ 48.951416] vprintk_default+0x20/0x28 [ 48.951416] printk+0x20/0x30 [ 48.951446] tk_debug_account_sleep_time+0x5c/0x70 [ 48.951446] __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime.constprop.3+0x170/0x1a0 [ 48.951446] timekeeping_resume+0x218/0x23c [ 48.951477] syscore_resume+0x94/0x42c [ 48.951477] suspend_enter+0x554/0x9b4 [ 48.951477] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xd8/0x4b4 [ 48.951507] enter_state+0x934/0xbd4 [ 48.951507] pm_suspend+0x14/0x70 [ 48.951507] state_store+0x68/0xc8 [ 48.951538] kernfs_fop_write+0xf4/0x1f8 [ 48.951538] __vfs_write+0x1c/0x114 [ 48.951538] vfs_write+0xa0/0x168 [ 48.951568] SyS_write+0x3c/0x90 [ 48.951568] __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x10 [ 48.951568] -> #0 (tk_core){----..}: [ 48.951599] lock_acquire+0xe0/0x294 [ 48.951599] ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x5c/0x1d4 [ 48.951629] retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90 [ 48.951629] on_each_cpu+0x40/0x7c [ 48.951629] clock_was_set_work+0x14/0x20 [ 48.951660] process_one_work+0x2b4/0x808 [ 48.951660] worker_thread+0x3c/0x550 [ 48.951660] kthread+0x104/0x148 [ 48.951690] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 [ 48.951690] other info that might help us debug this: [ 48.951690] Chain exists of: tk_core --> &rt_b->rt_runtime_lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock [ 48.951721] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 48.951721] CPU0 CPU1 [ 48.951721] ---- ---- [ 48.951721] lock(hrtimer_bases.lock); [ 48.951751] lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock); [ 48.951751] lock(hrtimer_bases.lock); [ 48.951751] lock(tk_core); [ 48.951782] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 48.951782] 3 locks held by kworker/0:0/3: [ 48.951782] #0: ("events"){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0156590>] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x808 [ 48.951812] openbmc#1: (hrtimer_work){+.+...}, at: [<c0156590>] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x808 [ 48.951843] openbmc#2: (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01cc610>] retrigger_next_event+0x38/0x90 [ 48.951843] stack backtrace: [ 48.951873] CPU: 0 PID: 3 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170213+ [ 48.951904] Workqueue: events clock_was_set_work [ 48.951904] [<c0110208>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c224>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 48.951934] [<c010c224>] (show_stack) from [<c04ca6c0>] (dump_stack+0xac/0xe0) [ 48.951934] [<c04ca6c0>] (dump_stack) from [<c019b5cc>] (print_circular_bug+0x1d0/0x308) [ 48.951965] [<c019b5cc>] (print_circular_bug) from [<c019d2a8>] (validate_chain+0xf50/0x1324) [ 48.951965] [<c019d2a8>] (validate_chain) from [<c019ec18>] (__lock_acquire+0x468/0x7e8) [ 48.951995] [<c019ec18>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c019f634>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x294) [ 48.951995] [<c019f634>] (lock_acquire) from [<c01d0ea0>] (ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x5c/0x1d4) [ 48.952026] [<c01d0ea0>] (ktime_get_update_offsets_now) from [<c01cc624>] (retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90) [ 48.952026] [<c01cc624>] (retrigger_next_event) from [<c01e4e24>] (on_each_cpu+0x40/0x7c) [ 48.952056] [<c01e4e24>] (on_each_cpu) from [<c01cafc4>] (clock_was_set_work+0x14/0x20) [ 48.952056] [<c01cafc4>] (clock_was_set_work) from [<c015664c>] (process_one_work+0x2b4/0x808) [ 48.952087] [<c015664c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0157774>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x550) [ 48.952087] [<c0157774>] (worker_thread) from [<c015d644>] (kthread+0x104/0x148) [ 48.952087] [<c015d644>] (kthread) from [<c0107830>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24) Replace printk() with printk_deferred(), which does not call into the scheduler. Fixes: 0bf43f1 ("timekeeping: Prints the amounts of time spent during suspend") Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: "[4.9+]" <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170215044332.30449-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
moved to openbmc/qemu openbmc/qemu#11 |
shenki
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 15, 2018
[ Upstream commit eae5f70 ] __printf is useful to verify format and arguments. Fix arg mismatch reported by gcc, remove the following warnings (with W=1): arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1467:31: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1471:31: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1504:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1505:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1506:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1507:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1508:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1509:33: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1975:39: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1986:27: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2567:38: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2567:46: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2569:38: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:2569:46: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long unsigned int’ The patch also include arg mismatch fix for case with #define DEBUG_PROM (warning not listed here). This patch fix also the following warnings revealed by checkpatch: WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'alloc_up', this function's name, in a string #101: FILE: arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1235: + prom_debug("alloc_up(%lx, %lx)\n", size, align); and WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'alloc_down', this function's name, in a string #138: FILE: arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:1278: + prom_debug("alloc_down(%lx, %lx, %s)\n", size, align, Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
shenki
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 4, 2019
[ Upstream commit 32d3182 ] packet_sendmsg() checks tx_ring.pg_vec to decide if it must call tpacket_snd(). Problem is that the check is lockless, meaning another thread can issue a concurrent setsockopt(PACKET_TX_RING ) to flip tx_ring.pg_vec back to NULL. Given that tpacket_snd() grabs pg_vec_lock mutex, we can perform the check again to solve the race. syzbot reported : kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 11429 Comm: syz-executor394 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc4+ #101 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:packet_lookup_frame+0x8d/0x270 net/packet/af_packet.c:474 Code: c1 ee 03 f7 73 0c 80 3c 0e 00 0f 85 cb 01 00 00 48 8b 0b 89 c0 4c 8d 24 c1 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 e1 48 c1 e9 03 <80> 3c 01 00 0f 85 94 01 00 00 48 8d 7b 10 4d 8b 3c 24 48 b8 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffff88809f82f7b8 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff8880a45c7030 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 1ffff110148b8e06 RDI: ffff8880a45c703c RBP: ffff88809f82f7e8 R08: ffff888087aea200 R09: fffffbfff134ae50 R10: fffffbfff134ae4f R11: ffffffff89a5727f R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8880a45c6ac0 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fa04716f700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fa04716edb8 CR3: 0000000091eb4000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: packet_current_frame net/packet/af_packet.c:487 [inline] tpacket_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:2667 [inline] packet_sendmsg+0x590/0x6250 net/packet/af_packet.c:2975 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:637 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xd7/0x130 net/socket.c:657 ___sys_sendmsg+0x3e2/0x920 net/socket.c:2311 __sys_sendmmsg+0x1bf/0x4d0 net/socket.c:2413 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2442 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2439 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x9d/0x100 net/socket.c:2439 do_syscall_64+0xfd/0x6a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:296 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Fixes: 69e3c75 ("net: TX_RING and packet mmap") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
shenki
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 5, 2020
commit 9ac26e9 upstream. With current ALU32 subreg handling and retval refine fix from last patches we see an expected failure in test_verifier. With verbose verifier state being printed at each step for clarity we have the following relavent lines [I omit register states that are not necessarily useful to see failure cause], #101/p bpf_get_stack return R0 within range FAIL Failed to load prog 'Success'! [..] 14: (85) call bpf_get_stack#67 R0_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=48,imm=0) R3_w=inv48 15: R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 15: (b7) r1 = 0 16: R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 16: (bf) r8 = r0 17: R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 R8_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 17: (67) r8 <<= 32 18: R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 R8_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372032559808512, umax_value=18446744069414584320, var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff00000000), s32_min_value=0, s32_max_value=0, u32_max_value=0, var32_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 18: (c7) r8 s>>= 32 19 R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648, smax_value=2147483647, var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 19: (cd) if r1 s< r8 goto pc+16 R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648, smax_value=0, var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 20: R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=48,var32_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=inv0 R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648, smax_value=0, R9=inv48 20: (1f) r9 -= r8 21: (bf) r2 = r7 22: R2_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=8,vs=48,imm=0) 22: (0f) r2 += r8 value -2147483648 makes map_value pointer be out of bounds After call bpf_get_stack() on line 14 and some moves we have at line 16 an r8 bound with max_value 48 but an unknown min value. This is to be expected bpf_get_stack call can only return a max of the input size but is free to return any negative error in the 32-bit register space. The C helper is returning an int so will use lower 32-bits. Lines 17 and 18 clear the top 32 bits with a left/right shift but use ARSH so we still have worst case min bound before line 19 of -2147483648. At this point the signed check 'r1 s< r8' meant to protect the addition on line 22 where dst reg is a map_value pointer may very well return true with a large negative number. Then the final line 22 will detect this as an invalid operation and fail the program. What we want to do is proceed only if r8 is positive non-error. So change 'r1 s< r8' to 'r1 s> r8' so that we jump if r8 is negative. Next we will throw an error because we access past the end of the map value. The map value size is 48 and sizeof(struct test_val) is 48 so we walk off the end of the map value on the second call to get bpf_get_stack(). Fix this by changing sizeof(struct test_val) to 24 by using 'sizeof(struct test_val) / 2'. After this everything passes as expected. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560426019.10843.3285429543232025187.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
shenki
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 5, 2020
[ no upstream commit ] Switch the comparison, so that is_branch_taken() will recognize that below branch is never taken: [...] 17: [...] R1_w=inv0 [...] R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648,smax_value=-1,umin_value=18446744071562067968,var_off=(0xffffffff80000000; 0x7fffffff)) [...] 17: (67) r8 <<= 32 18: [...] R8_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=-4294967296,umin_value=9223372036854775808,umax_value=18446744069414584320,var_off=(0x8000000000000000; 0x7fffffff00000000)) [...] 18: (c7) r8 s>>= 32 19: [...] R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648,smax_value=-1,umin_value=18446744071562067968,var_off=(0xffffffff80000000; 0x7fffffff)) [...] 19: (6d) if r1 s> r8 goto pc+16 [...] R1_w=inv0 [...] R8_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-2147483648,smax_value=-1,umin_value=18446744071562067968,var_off=(0xffffffff80000000; 0x7fffffff)) [...] [...] Currently we check for is_branch_taken() only if either K is source, or source is a scalar value that is const. For upstream it would be good to extend this properly to check whether dst is const and src not. For the sake of the test_verifier, it is probably not needed here: # ./test_verifier 101 #101/p bpf_get_stack return R0 within range OK Summary: 1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED I haven't seen this issue in test_progs* though, they are passing fine: # ./test_progs-no_alu32 -t get_stack Switching to flavor 'no_alu32' subdirectory... #20 get_stack_raw_tp:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED # ./test_progs -t get_stack #20 get_stack_raw_tp:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
shenki
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 30, 2020
[ Upstream commit ae284d8 ] syzkaller found that with CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y, unmounting an f2fs filesystem could result in the following splat: kobject: 'loop5' ((____ptrval____)): kobject_release, parent 0000000000000000 (delayed 250) kobject: 'f2fs_xattr_entry-7:5' ((____ptrval____)): kobject_release, parent 0000000000000000 (delayed 750) ------------[ cut here ]------------ ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x98 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 699 at lib/debugobjects.c:485 debug_print_object+0x180/0x240 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 699 Comm: syz-executor.5 Tainted: G S 5.9.0-rc8+ #101 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x4d8 show_stack+0x34/0x48 dump_stack+0x174/0x1f8 panic+0x360/0x7a0 __warn+0x244/0x2ec report_bug+0x240/0x398 bug_handler+0x50/0xc0 call_break_hook+0x160/0x1d8 brk_handler+0x30/0xc0 do_debug_exception+0x184/0x340 el1_dbg+0x48/0xb0 el1_sync_handler+0x170/0x1c8 el1_sync+0x80/0x100 debug_print_object+0x180/0x240 debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x200/0x430 slab_free_freelist_hook+0x190/0x210 kfree+0x13c/0x460 f2fs_put_super+0x624/0xa58 generic_shutdown_super+0x120/0x300 kill_block_super+0x94/0xf8 kill_f2fs_super+0x244/0x308 deactivate_locked_super+0x104/0x150 deactivate_super+0x118/0x148 cleanup_mnt+0x27c/0x3c0 __cleanup_mnt+0x28/0x38 task_work_run+0x10c/0x248 do_notify_resume+0x9d4/0x1188 work_pending+0x8/0x34c Like the error handling for f2fs_register_sysfs(), we need to wait for the kobject to be destroyed before returning to prevent a potential use-after-free. Fixes: bf9e697 ("f2fs: expose features to sysfs entry") Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
amboar
pushed a commit
to amboar/linux
that referenced
this issue
Nov 26, 2020
[ Upstream commit ae284d8 ] syzkaller found that with CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y, unmounting an f2fs filesystem could result in the following splat: kobject: 'loop5' ((____ptrval____)): kobject_release, parent 0000000000000000 (delayed 250) kobject: 'f2fs_xattr_entry-7:5' ((____ptrval____)): kobject_release, parent 0000000000000000 (delayed 750) ------------[ cut here ]------------ ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x98 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 699 at lib/debugobjects.c:485 debug_print_object+0x180/0x240 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 0 PID: 699 Comm: syz-executor.5 Tainted: G S 5.9.0-rc8+ openbmc#101 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x4d8 show_stack+0x34/0x48 dump_stack+0x174/0x1f8 panic+0x360/0x7a0 __warn+0x244/0x2ec report_bug+0x240/0x398 bug_handler+0x50/0xc0 call_break_hook+0x160/0x1d8 brk_handler+0x30/0xc0 do_debug_exception+0x184/0x340 el1_dbg+0x48/0xb0 el1_sync_handler+0x170/0x1c8 el1_sync+0x80/0x100 debug_print_object+0x180/0x240 debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x200/0x430 slab_free_freelist_hook+0x190/0x210 kfree+0x13c/0x460 f2fs_put_super+0x624/0xa58 generic_shutdown_super+0x120/0x300 kill_block_super+0x94/0xf8 kill_f2fs_super+0x244/0x308 deactivate_locked_super+0x104/0x150 deactivate_super+0x118/0x148 cleanup_mnt+0x27c/0x3c0 __cleanup_mnt+0x28/0x38 task_work_run+0x10c/0x248 do_notify_resume+0x9d4/0x1188 work_pending+0x8/0x34c Like the error handling for f2fs_register_sysfs(), we need to wait for the kobject to be destroyed before returning to prevent a potential use-after-free. Fixes: bf9e697 ("f2fs: expose features to sysfs entry") Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
amboar
pushed a commit
to amboar/linux
that referenced
this issue
Nov 26, 2020
[ Upstream commit c2a04b0 ] syzkaller found the following splat with CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y: Read of size 1 at addr ffff000028e896b8 by task kworker/1:2/228 CPU: 1 PID: 228 Comm: kworker/1:2 Tainted: G S 5.9.0-rc8+ openbmc#101 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: events kobject_delayed_cleanup Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x4d8 show_stack+0x34/0x48 dump_stack+0x174/0x1f8 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x5c/0x550 kasan_report+0x13c/0x1c0 __asan_report_load1_noabort+0x34/0x60 memcmp+0xd0/0xd8 gfs2_uevent+0xc4/0x188 kobject_uevent_env+0x54c/0x1240 kobject_uevent+0x2c/0x40 __kobject_del+0x190/0x1d8 kobject_delayed_cleanup+0x2bc/0x3b8 process_one_work+0x96c/0x18c0 worker_thread+0x3f0/0xc30 kthread+0x390/0x498 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Allocated by task 1110: kasan_save_stack+0x28/0x58 __kasan_kmalloc.isra.0+0xc8/0xe8 kasan_kmalloc+0x10/0x20 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1d8/0x2f0 alloc_super+0x64/0x8c0 sget_fc+0x110/0x620 get_tree_bdev+0x190/0x648 gfs2_get_tree+0x50/0x228 vfs_get_tree+0x84/0x2e8 path_mount+0x1134/0x1da8 do_mount+0x124/0x138 __arm64_sys_mount+0x164/0x238 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x15c/0x598 do_el0_svc+0x60/0x150 el0_svc+0x34/0xb0 el0_sync_handler+0xc8/0x5b4 el0_sync+0x15c/0x180 Freed by task 228: kasan_save_stack+0x28/0x58 kasan_set_track+0x28/0x40 kasan_set_free_info+0x24/0x48 __kasan_slab_free+0x118/0x190 kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x20 slab_free_freelist_hook+0x6c/0x210 kfree+0x13c/0x460 Use the same pattern as f2fs + ext4 where the kobject destruction must complete before allowing the FS itself to be freed. This means that we need an explicit free_sbd in the callers. Cc: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com> [Also go to fail_free when init_names fails.] Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
shenki
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2022
commit 6d82ad1 upstream. Running generic/406 causes the following WARNING in btrfs_destroy_inode() which tells there are outstanding extents left. In btrfs_get_blocks_direct_write(), we reserve a temporary outstanding extents with btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata() (or indirectly from btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(()). We then release the outstanding extents with btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(). However, the "len" can be modified in the COW case, which releases fewer outstanding extents than expected. Fix it by calling btrfs_delalloc_release_extents() for the original length. To reproduce the warning, the filesystem should be 1 GiB. It's triggering a short-write, due to not being able to allocate a large extent and instead allocating a smaller one. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 757 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:8848 btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1e6/0x210 [btrfs] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor lzo_compress lzo_decompress raid6_pq zstd zstd_decompress zstd_compress xxhash zram zsmalloc CPU: 0 PID: 757 Comm: umount Not tainted 5.17.0-rc8+ #101 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS d55cb5a 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1e6/0x210 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000327bda8 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888100548b78 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000026900 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff888100548b78 RBP: ffff888100548940 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88810b48aba8 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff8881004eb240 R12: ffff88810b48a800 R13: ffff88810b48ec08 R14: ffff88810b48ed00 R15: ffff888100490c68 FS: 00007f8549ea0b80(0000) GS:ffff888237c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f854a09e733 CR3: 000000010a2e9003 CR4: 0000000000370eb0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> destroy_inode+0x33/0x70 dispose_list+0x43/0x60 evict_inodes+0x161/0x1b0 generic_shutdown_super+0x2d/0x110 kill_anon_super+0xf/0x20 btrfs_kill_super+0xd/0x20 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x27/0x90 cleanup_mnt+0x12c/0x180 task_work_run+0x54/0x80 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x152/0x160 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x42/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f854a000fb7 Fixes: f0bfa76 ("btrfs: fix ENOSPC failure when attempting direct IO write into NOCOW range") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.17 Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Tested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
amboar
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 11, 2024
commit 1036f69 upstream. On RZ/Five SMARC EVK, where probing of SDHI is deferred due to probe deferral of the vqmmc-supply regulator: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/time/timer.c:1738 __run_timers.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e8 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4 #101 Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK based on r9a07g043f01 (DT) epc : __run_timers.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e8 ra : __run_timers.part.0+0x134/0x1e8 epc : ffffffff800771a4 ra : ffffffff80077108 sp : ffffffc800003e60 gp : ffffffff814f5028 tp : ffffffff8140c5c0 t0 : ffffffc800000000 t1 : 0000000000000001 t2 : ffffffff81201300 s0 : ffffffc800003f20 s1 : ffffffd8023bc4a0 a0 : 00000000fffee6b0 a1 : 0004010000400000 a2 : ffffffffc0000016 a3 : ffffffff81488640 a4 : ffffffc800003e60 a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000004000000 a7 : ffffffc800003e68 s2 : 0000000000000122 s3 : 0000000000200000 s4 : 0000000000000000 s5 : ffffffffffffffff s6 : ffffffff81488678 s7 : ffffffff814886c0 s8 : ffffffff814f49c0 s9 : ffffffff81488640 s10: 0000000000000000 s11: ffffffc800003e60 t3 : 0000000000000240 t4 : 0000000000000a52 t5 : ffffffd8024ae018 t6 : ffffffd8024ae038 status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003 [<ffffffff800771a4>] __run_timers.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e8 [<ffffffff800771e0>] run_timer_softirq+0x24/0x4a [<ffffffff80809092>] __do_softirq+0xc6/0x1fa [<ffffffff80028e4c>] irq_exit_rcu+0x66/0x84 [<ffffffff80800f7a>] handle_riscv_irq+0x40/0x4e [<ffffffff80808f48>] call_on_irq_stack+0x1c/0x28 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- What happens? renesas_sdhi_probe() { tmio_mmc_host_alloc() mmc_alloc_host() INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&host->detect, mmc_rescan); devm_request_irq(tmio_mmc_irq); /* * After this, the interrupt handler may be invoked at any time * * tmio_mmc_irq() * { * __tmio_mmc_card_detect_irq() * mmc_detect_change() * _mmc_detect_change() * mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, delay); * } */ tmio_mmc_host_probe() tmio_mmc_init_ocr() -EPROBE_DEFER tmio_mmc_host_free() mmc_free_host() } When expire_timers() runs later, it warns because the MMC host structure containing the delayed work was freed, and now contains an invalid work function pointer. Fix this by cancelling any pending delayed work before releasing the MMC host structure. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Tested-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/205dc4c91b47e31b64392fe2498c7a449e717b4b.1701689330.git.geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I've seen this panic with 6d93f62 a number of times under qemu's palmetto-bmc machine. Unsure at this stage whether it's the kernel or something qemu is doing wrong and I admit my qemu build is a bit of a mashup, but here's the panic output:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: