fix(ui): separate asset drilldown types

[gallotamas]

Description

Fix for #804
Create separate details views for the different asset types and only show the relevant fields of specific types.

Screenshots for the different asset types (I don't have a PodInfo and DirInfo asset so I couldn't create a screenshot for them but the views have been updated for them as well):
VMInfo:

ContainerInfo:

ContainerImageInfo:

Type of Change

[ ] Bug Fix
[ ] New Feature
[ ] Breaking Change
[x] Refactor
[ ] Documentation
[ ] Other (please describe)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guidelines
• Existing issues have been referenced (where applicable)
• I have verified this change is not present in other open pull requests
• Functionality is documented
• All code style checks pass
• New code contribution is covered by automated tests
• All new and existing tests pass

[gallotamas]

@Tehsmash @chrisgacsal I've updated the asset details view. Let me know what you think.

[Tehsmash]

Looking good so far @gallotamas! Couple of feedback items:

• For ContainerImageInfo I'd like to see the RepoTags and RepoDigests closer together, and presented so that it appears a list. (if we can prevent line wrapping too by including them on their own row in the box that would be even better too)

• For ContainerInfo it would be good to have all the ContainerImageInfo as a subsection/ under a subheading and mimic the ContainerImageInfo page as closely as possible.

[gallotamas]

Looking good so far @gallotamas! Couple of feedback items:

• For ContainerImageInfo I'd like to see the RepoTags and RepoDigests closer together, and presented so that it appears a list. (if we can prevent line wrapping too by including them on their own row in the box that would be even better too)
• For ContainerInfo it would be good to have all the ContainerImageInfo as a subsection/ under a subheading and mimic the ContainerImageInfo page as closely as possible.

sounds good, thanks for the feedback @Tehsmash

[gallotamas]

@Tehsmash I made some changes based on your feedback. Can you take another look?

[chrisgacsal]

LGTM! Although I have not tested it. @Tehsmash @akpsgit wdyt?

[github-actions]

Hey!

Your images are ready:

• ghcr.io/openclarity/vmclarity-apiserver-dev:pr860-20bd8f90c426f6ad79b4a3bbb84eaab3b70259cf
• ghcr.io/openclarity/vmclarity-orchestrator-dev:pr860-20bd8f90c426f6ad79b4a3bbb84eaab3b70259cf
• ghcr.io/openclarity/vmclarity-ui-backend-dev:pr860-20bd8f90c426f6ad79b4a3bbb84eaab3b70259cf
• ghcr.io/openclarity/vmclarity-ui-dev:pr860-20bd8f90c426f6ad79b4a3bbb84eaab3b70259cf
• ghcr.io/openclarity/vmclarity-cli-dev:pr860-20bd8f90c426f6ad79b4a3bbb84eaab3b70259cf