-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RHOAIENG-8299: Fix CentOS Stream 8 download location #554
RHOAIENG-8299: Fix CentOS Stream 8 download location #554
Conversation
be82b7f
to
93f0c32
Compare
93f0c32
to
5d406d6
Compare
Previously used location is now unavailable and returns 404 error. This is because CentOS Stream 8 has been EOLd This new location is an archive and is no longer receiving updates.
5d406d6
to
8e19ee2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the update
The images built successfully! All set :) /lgtm |
/retest |
Regarding failing e2e tests. The intel image is a beast of almost 15GiB (compressed) and it downloads additional almost 400MiB of samples when it starts. It makes sense that it won't start up quickly, especially on our abused openshift-ci. My home net connection can't take such abuse and I had to switch to running this on a remote machine in Brno. I'll retrigger this a few more times and maybe I'll get lucky
/retest |
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
2 similar comments
/test notebooks-e2e-tests |
/test notebooks-e2e-tests |
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
7 similar comments
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
/override ci/prow/notebooks-e2e-tests as it is failing on intel notebook which is not related to habana |
@atheo89: Overrode contexts on behalf of atheo89: ci/prow/notebooks-e2e-tests In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: atheo89, jstourac The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@jiridanek @harshad16 don't we need this (or at least some parts of this) to backport also for the 2023b branch? 🤔 |
/cherrypick 2023b |
@jiridanek: #554 failed to apply on top of branch "2023b":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/cherrypick 2023a |
@atheo89: #554 failed to apply on top of branch "2023a":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
#619 |
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-8299
Description
Previously used location is now unavailable and returns 404 error. This is because CentOS Stream 8 has been EOLd
This new location is an archive and is no longer receiving updates.
How Has This Been Tested?
I thought about it really hard and I was very careful, promise. Oh yeah, and I did a podman image build, btw.
Merge criteria: