Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any chance for SignRecover and VerifyRecover implementation? #745

Open
msetina opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Any chance for SignRecover and VerifyRecover implementation? #745

msetina opened this issue Apr 11, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@msetina
Copy link

msetina commented Apr 11, 2024

I am going over operations in PKCS11 and found SignRecover and VerifyRecover, but I can not find equivalent functions implemented here. Is there a plan for them?

https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/24294/how-do-signrecover-and-verifyrecover-work

@AlexanderBand
Copy link

Please note this statement on the status of SoftHSM v2 development.

@msetina
Copy link
Author

msetina commented Apr 15, 2024

Thank you for heads up. There is a reality that the statement does not cover is a resut of quality of the implementation, as there a projects that use it as part of test cycle. Missing implementations then hinder their development. I hope we can find resources to rejuvenate this project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants