Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(cvc-operator): add automatic scaling of volumereplicas for CSI volumes #1613
feat(cvc-operator): add automatic scaling of volumereplicas for CSI volumes #1613
Changes from 1 commit
af522b4
21245cd
641bc8c
0030e9a
15cb229
2129e1e
16f4afa
715acc8
68c2eae
ecf5801
05b4bf2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
getModifiedPDBForScaledVolume
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
getModifiedPDBForScaledVolume
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we consider picking replicationCount from CVC instead of CV for cstor-volume-mgmt?
This will avoid maintaining this info at multiple places. So, cstor-volume-mgmt will do like:
what steps does cstor-vol-mgmt performs on noticing change in DRF?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried to find from code, but unable to find other than scale down
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this info on how cstor-vol-mgmt works helps in review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will update PR with relevant pr's
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://github.com/openebs/maya/blob/dd6152021192d2bebcd77487da0b7bdef7249dfe/cmd/cstor-volume-mgmt/controller/volume-controller/handler.go#L483
Comments will explain the case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://github.com/openebs/maya/blob/dd6152021192d2bebcd77487da0b7bdef7249dfe/cmd/cstor-volume-mgmt/controller/volume-controller/handler.go#L534
Scaleup function in cstor-volume-mgmt and updated the PR description with relevant PR's.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this check sufficient? we need to make sure that - all the content in PoolInfo need to be part of ReplicaPoolInfo also, and then, few more are there in it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These kind checks should be a head before that is admission server.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here as well, check should be - there are no extra things in RepliaPoolInfo other than what is present in PoolInfo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as above
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should this limitation get into webhooks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Once the webhook for CVC is ready we will have following checks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.