chore(rbac): remove unnecessary rbac secret rule #276
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Abhilash Shetty <abhilash.shetty@datacore.com>
abhilashshetty04
requested review from
avishnu,
Abhinandan-Purkait and
niladrih
niladrih
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2023
Abhinandan-Purkait
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request template
Please, go through these steps before you submit a PR.
Why is this PR required? What issue does it fix?:
Remove rbac rules on secrets. lvm local pv does not need it.
Does this PR require any upgrade changes?:
It does not need upgrade change.
If the changes in this PR are manually verified, list down the scenarios covered::
e2e verified that pipeline completed successfully.
Checklist:
<type>(<scope>): <subject>