Test codejail on Python 3.11

[feanil]

This repository is a depedency of edx-platform and needs to be upgraded to Python 3.11 before
the Readwood release is cut (mid-April).

• Requirements are compiled with Python 3.8
• Tests are run on Python 3.8 and 3.11
• (Optional) Tests are also run with 3.12 and passing or 3.12 issues are ticketed.
• Classifiers in setup.py setup.cfg or pyproject.toml indicate Python 3.11 support
• A new version is release to PyPI
• A PR is merged to edx-platform to use the new version

[kdmccormick]

This ticket will handle upgrading codejail itself to 3.11. As a follow-up, we will need to upgrade edx-platform's codejail execution environment (a.k.a. edx-sandbox) to Python 3.11/3.12: openedx/edx-platform#34469

[ichintanjoshi]

assign me

[feanil]

I just took a look at the CI for this repo and it looks like it's quite complicated. I think in order to test on newer versions, we'll first have to add a new Dockerfile that is the same as the existing one but tests in python 3.11.

Then we'll have to update push-docker-image workflow to publish 2 images, one at latest and one at the 3.11 tag. Once that has landed, we should be able to run tests on the latest or the 3.8 image.

[MoisesGSalas]

Hi @feanil, I would like to help on the 3.11 upgrade. If you are lacking on bandwidth I can take on this issue. Or if you need help somewhere else I can give a hand.

[feanil]

@MoisesGSalas I think this one is a bit complicated and I'm already working on it, but maybe you could take a look at openedx/credentials#2389 and suggest/make a further PR to get tests passing on Credentials.

[MoisesGSalas]

I was focusing on this one because I was recently appointed as maintainer for the codejail repo, so I would really like to one something related to it to get more familiar (even if it's not this specific task).

I do have a bit of experience running codejail (mostly k8s) so I would like to hear any recommendation on where I can help. (I can still check the credentials one, but literally have 0 experience with that service).

[feanil]

Ah, gotcha, @MoisesGSalas take a look at #167 please review.