Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed paver code and scripts specific to unit testing #31180

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2023

Conversation

zubairshakoorarbisoft
Copy link
Contributor

@zubairshakoorarbisoft zubairshakoorarbisoft commented Oct 20, 2022

Description

Remove the codebase specific for python unit testing in the paver. We have moved to use pytest directly for python unit testing so now removing all obsolete code.

@bradenmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor

@zubairshakoorarbisoft could you please expand the PR description with a little more details about the reason for this change?
And please remove the template text like "Useful information to include:" and "Please provide detailed step-by-step instructions for testing this change." if you are not using it.

@zubairshakoorarbisoft
Copy link
Contributor Author

zubairshakoorarbisoft commented Oct 21, 2022 via email

@zubairshakoorarbisoft zubairshakoorarbisoft force-pushed the zshkoor/paver-code-removal branch 4 times, most recently from 64b45c0 to 4faebca Compare December 7, 2022 10:02
Copy link
Contributor

@iamsobanjaved iamsobanjaved left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

("compare-branch=", "b", "Branch to compare against, defaults to origin/master"),
], share_with=['coverage'])
@timed
def diff_coverage(options):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is being used currently by JS tests so moved this command to this file

@zubairshakoorarbisoft zubairshakoorarbisoft changed the title fix: paver js_test, tests and test_js_test unit testing removed Removed paver code and scripts specific to unit testing Dec 21, 2022
Copy link
Member

@UsamaSadiq UsamaSadiq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good overall but need a few more changes to be merged:

  • Update the script paver_autocomplete to remove unnecessary references or the script altogether.
  • Update the PR description with a details description & summary of why these changes are being made.

@zubairshakoorarbisoft zubairshakoorarbisoft merged commit 141d6d4 into master Jan 18, 2023
@zubairshakoorarbisoft zubairshakoorarbisoft deleted the zshkoor/paver-code-removal branch January 18, 2023 12:41
@edx-pipeline-bot
Copy link
Contributor

EdX Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the staging environment in preparation for a release to production.

@edx-pipeline-bot
Copy link
Contributor

EdX Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the production environment.

kdmccormick added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2023
The contents of this file were deleted by
#31180;
this commit just deletes the leftover empty file.
kdmccormick added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2023
The contents of this file were deleted by
#31180;
this commit just deletes the leftover empty file.
kdmccormick added a commit to kdmccormick/edx-platform that referenced this pull request May 11, 2023
The contents of this file were deleted by
openedx#31180;
this commit just deletes the leftover empty file.
kdmccormick added a commit that referenced this pull request May 11, 2023
The contents of this file were deleted by
#31180;
this commit just deletes the leftover empty file.
JuanDavidBuitrago pushed a commit to eduNEXT/edx-platform that referenced this pull request May 25, 2023
The contents of this file were deleted by
openedx#31180;
this commit just deletes the leftover empty file.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants