Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add mod to past encounter billing view #643

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 14, 2017

Conversation

stephenwaite
Copy link
Sponsor Member

No description provided.

@bradymiller
Copy link
Sponsor Member

This is very straightforward and will bring this into the codebase. thanks for the contribution! -brady

@bradymiller bradymiller merged commit 4e0c1c8 into openemr:master Apr 14, 2017
@stephenwaite stephenwaite deleted the add_mod_past_enc branch April 14, 2017 01:47
@robertdown
Copy link
Member

Would prefer to follow coding standards on new PRs. Gladly would have done this but it was merged so quickly I didn't even get a chance to see it.

Perhaps we can add a tag "Code Standards Approved" (Along with "Code Standards Exception Approved" for times when we are willing to bring in code w/o it complying with standards)? I'll also look to see if Travis could do this check automatically

@bradymiller
Copy link
Sponsor Member

@robertdown Didn't note that when i brought it in. What code standard did this break?

@robertdown
Copy link
Member

@bradymiller
Copy link
Sponsor Member

Isn't a unnested 1 line ternary ok?

@bradymiller
Copy link
Sponsor Member

oh wait, its not a ternary. just a simple if :)
this would be tough to filter via travis since there are many instances of this structure in the codebase

@bradymiller
Copy link
Sponsor Member

@robertdown , just committed a fix for this:
fa387da

And will start to incorporate code standards into reviews.

thanks, -brady

@MatthewVita
Copy link
Member

@robertdown, @bradymiller

I'll also look to see if Travis could do this check automatically

See this conversation I'm having with bobison:

#492 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants