You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently a unit can be of type suffix but not have a suffix included and the inverse is also possible for both creating and editing a unit. It does not make sense to have such a combination and an admin should be forced to include both or neither. If a suffix is added but the unit is not of type suffix then the admin should be told the type will be changed to suffix. If the unit is of type suffix but there is no suffix unit then the suffix input should become red and an entry required before saving.
Screenshots
Examples for create a unit are shown but edit behaves similarly.
Additional context
Currently the admin help warns about doing this so hopefully it will not happen but this fix would mean the documentation can be updated to say it cannot happen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
Currently a unit can be of type suffix but not have a suffix included and the inverse is also possible for both creating and editing a unit. It does not make sense to have such a combination and an admin should be forced to include both or neither. If a suffix is added but the unit is not of type suffix then the admin should be told the type will be changed to suffix. If the unit is of type suffix but there is no suffix unit then the suffix input should become red and an entry required before saving.
Screenshots
Examples for create a unit are shown but edit behaves similarly.
Additional context
Currently the admin help warns about doing this so hopefully it will not happen but this fix would mean the documentation can be updated to say it cannot happen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: