Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate using types alone for Decoder bindings #15

Closed
codefromthecrypt opened this issue Jul 12, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Investigate using types alone for Decoder bindings #15

codefromthecrypt opened this issue Jul 12, 2013 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

currently, we use method key (ex. IAM or IAM#auth(String,String)) to wire decoders to the methods that need them. This is consistent with error handlers, etc, but possibly overkill for decoders, where the intended result is always correlated to the return type of the method (or the type param of the observer).

If we switch to type-only, it is possible for us to use Set bindings, to collect decoders. Something far less complicated then our current approach.

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor Author

closed via #20

velo pushed a commit to velo/feign that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant