Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make test env use latest release of openfe and gufe instead of main #203

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 20, 2023

Conversation

dotsdl
Copy link
Member

@dotsdl dotsdl commented Nov 20, 2023

Now that openfe and gufe are operating at regular release cadences, I think it makes sense for us to perform testing against the latest releases of these on conda-forge instead of testing against the main branches of them. In particular, this saves us the need of having to manually track their dependencies, such as the recently added kartograf dependency in openfe.

I think this is generally a safe move, since we only ever deploy production envs with releases of these packages too (pinned to specific releases). The CI/test env still operates as a canary of upstream changes, but on a delay dependent on upstream releases compared to current state.

Now that `openfe` and `gufe` are operating at regular release cadences,
I think it makes sense for us to perform testing against the latest
releases of these on `conda-forge` instead of testing against the `main`
branches of them. In particular, this saves us the need of having to
manually track their dependencies, such as the recently added
`kartograf` dependency in `openfe`.

I think this is generally a safe move, since we only ever deploy
production envs with releases of these packages too (pinned to specific
releases). The CI/test env still operates as a canary of upstream
changes, but on a delay dependent on upstream releases compared to
current state.
@dotsdl
Copy link
Member Author

dotsdl commented Nov 20, 2023

@mikemhenry thoughts on this? Any reasons why we might not want to go this route?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 20, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (bdcc1f4) 82.85% compared to head (33d24c1) 82.26%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #203      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.85%   82.26%   -0.59%     
==========================================
  Files          22       22              
  Lines        2735     2735              
==========================================
- Hits         2266     2250      -16     
- Misses        469      485      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Comment on lines 9 to 10
- gufe
- openfe
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not blocking but doing >= for min versions we support would save us from pulling in something old by mistake

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM, only other thing would be remove the stuff commented out since it looks like it works without it

Co-authored-by: Mike Henry <11765982+mikemhenry@users.noreply.github.com>
@dotsdl
Copy link
Member Author

dotsdl commented Nov 20, 2023

Awesome, thanks @mikemhenry! Merging!

@dotsdl dotsdl merged commit 0d59001 into main Nov 20, 2023
4 checks passed
@dotsdl dotsdl deleted the test-upstream-releases branch November 20, 2023 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants