What to do when rdkit.Chem.AssignStereochemistry does not add chiral code in Molecule.to_rdkit()?

[andrrizzi]

Likely related to #146 and #156 .

With certain molecules, (e.g. DrugBank_6355, which is molecule 156 in the MiniDrugBank test set) this call of rdkit.Chem.Chem.AssignStereochemistry results in

>>> rdatom.GetChiralTag()
rdkit.Chem.rdchem.ChiralType.CHI_UNSPECIFIED

If the code continues, this line results in KeyError: '_CIPCode'.

Differently from from_rdkit(), we already know what stereochemistry that atom should have so it doesn't make much sense to raise an exception.

Is there a different way of setting the stereochemistry using S and R convention in RDKit? Alternatively, is there a way we can save the (read-only) chirality information in our Atom class using the CW/CCW notation alongside the S/R convention?

[j-wags]

Some potential fixes would be:

• If R or S can't be achieved by trying CW/CCW, force-add them with rdatom.SetProp('_CIPCode', 'R'). Note, however, that this won't affect the rdmol's actual topology, and would be overwritten if Chem.AssignStereochemistry is run again on the rdmol.
• As an alternative to the above, set CW/CCW in these cases, where CW means 'R', and CCW means S. Then, implement checks for these cases in OFFMol.from_rdkit. Note that there would be undefined behavior if the user ran Chem.AssignStereochemistry on this.
• Hope that it's not critically important that this stereochemistry be defined, and just lose the information while converting the OFFMol to an RDmol.

[proteneer]

S and R are perceived in the sense that they're "global". CW/CCW are local in that they only look at the adjacent 4 neighbors. What exactly are you trying to do?

[j-wags]

So, this is a surprisingly deep issue. For for background: #146

Short version: The essential problem arises from the idea that an OFFMol has completely defined stereochemistry. After all, a person could make a stero-specific SMARTS, and we'd be expected to match it. However, while OpenEye records stereochemistry around groups like R=NH (primary imine) and N(R1)(R2)(R3) (pyramidal nitrogen), RDKit doesn't. So, when we take molecules with completely-defined stereo and try to turn them into rdmols, our conversion function gets confused and raises this exception.

[proteneer]

I see - am I correct in understanding that RDKit doesn't allow for over-specification of Stereochemistry, where as OEChem does?

[proteneer]

PS - CIP is poorly defined to start with. The cahn-ingold-prelog rules are pretty bullshit to start with anyways (so I'd avoid doing stuff that depends on R/S to start with).

[j-wags]

"over-specification" is a tricky thing to define. The two major toolkit differences are

1. stereo around primary imines and
2. stereo around pyramidal nitrogens.

So, one question is: Should these be "defining" features of a molecular topology in the context of an MD simulation? Inversion rates for pyramidal nitrogens are on the order of 1/microsecond, and can vary a lot depending on substituents. So, maybe. And if in doubt, yes.

Another questions is: Is there physical justification for assigning different parameters due to atom (not bond) stereochemistry? Yes, if there are two or more chiral atoms in a molecule, it can have different properties.

[j-wags]

Yeah, I also don't like CIP. But it would take a long time to implement local stereochemistry, and we're already behind schedule. To stay on track we're going to stick with R/S.

#139

[andrrizzi]

I'm implementing solution 1:

If R or S can't be achieved by trying CW/CCW, force-add them with rdatom.SetProp('_CIPCode', 'R'). Note, however, that this won't affect the rdmol's actual topology, and would be overwritten if Chem.AssignStereochemistry is run again on the rdmol.

[j-wags]

@andrrizzi Sounds good.

You probably already caught this, but, when we have to do that override, make sure to do it after our last AssignStereochemistry call, otherwise I think all the _CIPCode fields may be overwritten.

[andrrizzi]

Implemented in #209 .